Zero-sum politics in contested spaces: The unintended consequencesof legislative peacebuilding in Northern Ireland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Studies of ethno-nationalist conflict have repeatedly underlined the significance of policy interventions that seek to de-territorialise contested space after armed conflict and create more plural societies. Creating ‘shared’ space in divided societies is often critically important and inextricably linked to peacebuilding. However much of this scholarship has tended to focus on the relative success or failure of such policies. This paper conversely explores the ‘unintended consequences’ (Merton, 1936) of legislating around fragile public space in Northern Ireland and considers its potential to undermine, rather than reinforce efforts to transition to peace. Drawing on a body of work around unintended consequences, territorial socialisation and peacebuilding, we argue that such legislation in ethno-nationalist societies emerging from conflict is a double-edged sword which can be utilised both explicitly and implicitly to reactivate tribal spatial politics and exacerbate divisions in deeply divided societies
LanguageEnglish
Pages193-202
JournalPolitical Geography
Volume61
Early online date15 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2017

Fingerprint

politics
society
Socialisation
public space
peace
legislation
Peacebuilding
Northern Ireland
conflict
policy
Nationalists

Keywords

  • Unintended consequences
  • Zero-sum conflict
  • Legislation
  • Territorial socialisation
  • Peacebuilding
  • Northern Ireland

Cite this

@article{614bf758b00045d597e613cb80325b08,
title = "Zero-sum politics in contested spaces: The unintended consequencesof legislative peacebuilding in Northern Ireland",
abstract = "Studies of ethno-nationalist conflict have repeatedly underlined the significance of policy interventions that seek to de-territorialise contested space after armed conflict and create more plural societies. Creating ‘shared’ space in divided societies is often critically important and inextricably linked to peacebuilding. However much of this scholarship has tended to focus on the relative success or failure of such policies. This paper conversely explores the ‘unintended consequences’ (Merton, 1936) of legislating around fragile public space in Northern Ireland and considers its potential to undermine, rather than reinforce efforts to transition to peace. Drawing on a body of work around unintended consequences, territorial socialisation and peacebuilding, we argue that such legislation in ethno-nationalist societies emerging from conflict is a double-edged sword which can be utilised both explicitly and implicitly to reactivate tribal spatial politics and exacerbate divisions in deeply divided societies",
keywords = "Unintended consequences, Zero-sum conflict, Legislation, Territorial socialisation, Peacebuilding, Northern Ireland",
author = "Sara McDowell and M{\'a}ire Braniff and Joanne Murphy",
note = "Compliant in UIR; evidence uploaded in 'Other files'",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.09.001",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "193--202",

}

Zero-sum politics in contested spaces: The unintended consequencesof legislative peacebuilding in Northern Ireland. / McDowell, Sara; Braniff, Máire; Murphy, Joanne.

Vol. 61, 30.11.2017, p. 193-202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Zero-sum politics in contested spaces: The unintended consequencesof legislative peacebuilding in Northern Ireland

AU - McDowell, Sara

AU - Braniff, Máire

AU - Murphy, Joanne

N1 - Compliant in UIR; evidence uploaded in 'Other files'

PY - 2017/11/30

Y1 - 2017/11/30

N2 - Studies of ethno-nationalist conflict have repeatedly underlined the significance of policy interventions that seek to de-territorialise contested space after armed conflict and create more plural societies. Creating ‘shared’ space in divided societies is often critically important and inextricably linked to peacebuilding. However much of this scholarship has tended to focus on the relative success or failure of such policies. This paper conversely explores the ‘unintended consequences’ (Merton, 1936) of legislating around fragile public space in Northern Ireland and considers its potential to undermine, rather than reinforce efforts to transition to peace. Drawing on a body of work around unintended consequences, territorial socialisation and peacebuilding, we argue that such legislation in ethno-nationalist societies emerging from conflict is a double-edged sword which can be utilised both explicitly and implicitly to reactivate tribal spatial politics and exacerbate divisions in deeply divided societies

AB - Studies of ethno-nationalist conflict have repeatedly underlined the significance of policy interventions that seek to de-territorialise contested space after armed conflict and create more plural societies. Creating ‘shared’ space in divided societies is often critically important and inextricably linked to peacebuilding. However much of this scholarship has tended to focus on the relative success or failure of such policies. This paper conversely explores the ‘unintended consequences’ (Merton, 1936) of legislating around fragile public space in Northern Ireland and considers its potential to undermine, rather than reinforce efforts to transition to peace. Drawing on a body of work around unintended consequences, territorial socialisation and peacebuilding, we argue that such legislation in ethno-nationalist societies emerging from conflict is a double-edged sword which can be utilised both explicitly and implicitly to reactivate tribal spatial politics and exacerbate divisions in deeply divided societies

KW - Unintended consequences

KW - Zero-sum conflict

KW - Legislation

KW - Territorial socialisation

KW - Peacebuilding

KW - Northern Ireland

U2 - 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.09.001

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 193

EP - 202

ER -