Wrong about Rights: Public Knowledge of Key Areas of Consumer, Housing and Employment Law in England and Wales

Pascoe Pleasence, Nigel Balmer, Catrina Denvir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Over many decades, processes of juridification have brought about huge growth in legal rights, responsibilities and protections. Yet, citizens appear to poorly understand the ‘law thick’ world in which they live. This impacts on the capability of citizens to ‘name, blame and claim’ in the legal domain; at a time of retreat from public funding of civil legal services. This paper looks at public knowledge of rights in key areas relating to consumer, housing and employment law. Drawing on data from the 2010-2012 English and Welsh Civil and Social Justice Survey, the paper uses responses to a series of hypothetical scenarios to explore public knowledge of rights and characteristics associated with knowledge. Our findings highlight a substantial deficit in the public’s understanding of legal rights and responsibilities – even among those for whom particular rights and responsibilities have specific bearing. We contextualise our finding with reference to what they mean for public legal education and the efficiency, efficacy and legitimacy of the law.
LanguageEnglish
Pages836-859
JournalModern Law Review
Volume80
Issue number5
Early online date6 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 6 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

employment law
rights and responsibilities
housing
juridification
citizen
Law
social justice
deficit
legitimacy
funding
scenario
efficiency
education

Keywords

  • legal rights
  • access to justice
  • public legal education
  • justiciable problems
  • civil justice

Cite this

@article{262f8d5cd12341238eeec99d3fedbbd6,
title = "Wrong about Rights: Public Knowledge of Key Areas of Consumer, Housing and Employment Law in England and Wales",
abstract = "Over many decades, processes of juridification have brought about huge growth in legal rights, responsibilities and protections. Yet, citizens appear to poorly understand the ‘law thick’ world in which they live. This impacts on the capability of citizens to ‘name, blame and claim’ in the legal domain; at a time of retreat from public funding of civil legal services. This paper looks at public knowledge of rights in key areas relating to consumer, housing and employment law. Drawing on data from the 2010-2012 English and Welsh Civil and Social Justice Survey, the paper uses responses to a series of hypothetical scenarios to explore public knowledge of rights and characteristics associated with knowledge. Our findings highlight a substantial deficit in the public’s understanding of legal rights and responsibilities – even among those for whom particular rights and responsibilities have specific bearing. We contextualise our finding with reference to what they mean for public legal education and the efficiency, efficacy and legitimacy of the law.",
keywords = "legal rights, access to justice, public legal education, justiciable problems, civil justice",
author = "Pascoe Pleasence and Nigel Balmer and Catrina Denvir",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1111/1468-2230.12290",
language = "English",
volume = "80",
pages = "836--859",
journal = "Modern Law Review",
issn = "0026-7961",
number = "5",

}

Wrong about Rights: Public Knowledge of Key Areas of Consumer, Housing and Employment Law in England and Wales. / Pleasence, Pascoe; Balmer, Nigel; Denvir, Catrina.

In: Modern Law Review, Vol. 80, No. 5, 06.09.2017, p. 836-859.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wrong about Rights: Public Knowledge of Key Areas of Consumer, Housing and Employment Law in England and Wales

AU - Pleasence, Pascoe

AU - Balmer, Nigel

AU - Denvir, Catrina

PY - 2017/9/6

Y1 - 2017/9/6

N2 - Over many decades, processes of juridification have brought about huge growth in legal rights, responsibilities and protections. Yet, citizens appear to poorly understand the ‘law thick’ world in which they live. This impacts on the capability of citizens to ‘name, blame and claim’ in the legal domain; at a time of retreat from public funding of civil legal services. This paper looks at public knowledge of rights in key areas relating to consumer, housing and employment law. Drawing on data from the 2010-2012 English and Welsh Civil and Social Justice Survey, the paper uses responses to a series of hypothetical scenarios to explore public knowledge of rights and characteristics associated with knowledge. Our findings highlight a substantial deficit in the public’s understanding of legal rights and responsibilities – even among those for whom particular rights and responsibilities have specific bearing. We contextualise our finding with reference to what they mean for public legal education and the efficiency, efficacy and legitimacy of the law.

AB - Over many decades, processes of juridification have brought about huge growth in legal rights, responsibilities and protections. Yet, citizens appear to poorly understand the ‘law thick’ world in which they live. This impacts on the capability of citizens to ‘name, blame and claim’ in the legal domain; at a time of retreat from public funding of civil legal services. This paper looks at public knowledge of rights in key areas relating to consumer, housing and employment law. Drawing on data from the 2010-2012 English and Welsh Civil and Social Justice Survey, the paper uses responses to a series of hypothetical scenarios to explore public knowledge of rights and characteristics associated with knowledge. Our findings highlight a substantial deficit in the public’s understanding of legal rights and responsibilities – even among those for whom particular rights and responsibilities have specific bearing. We contextualise our finding with reference to what they mean for public legal education and the efficiency, efficacy and legitimacy of the law.

KW - legal rights

KW - access to justice

KW - public legal education

KW - justiciable problems

KW - civil justice

UR - http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1573197/

U2 - 10.1111/1468-2230.12290

DO - 10.1111/1468-2230.12290

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 836

EP - 859

JO - Modern Law Review

T2 - Modern Law Review

JF - Modern Law Review

SN - 0026-7961

IS - 5

ER -