Women and Turkish Cinema: gender politics, cultural identity and representation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There has been a significant recent increase in the number of English-language monographs on Turkish cinema. Savas Arslan’s Cinema in Turkey (2010), Asuman Suner’s New Turkish Cinema (2010) and Gonul Donmez-Colin’s specialized volumes (The Routledge Dictionary of Turkish Cinema, 2013; Turkish Cinema: identity, distance andbelonging; 2013) attest to this new proliferation. Eylem Atakav’s book focuses on women and Turkish cinema in the context of politics, cultural identity and representation. The book’s central claim is that enforced depoliticization introduced after the coup of 1980 is responsible for uniting feminism and film in Turkey. Atakav claims that the feminist movement was not perceived as politically significant during that decade, thus it was allowed to flourish. These films focused on individuals, on women’s issues and lives, while trying to avoid being perceived as overtly political.
LanguageEnglish
Pages116-119
JournalHistorical Journal of film, radio and television
Volume34
Issue number1
Early online date4 Dec 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2014

Fingerprint

cultural identity
cinema
politics
gender
Glossaries
Turkey
women's issues
feminism
dictionary
proliferation
English language
Cultural Identity
Cultural Representations
Gender Politics
Turkish Cinema

Keywords

  • women
  • film
  • cinema
  • gender
  • Turkish

Cite this

@article{c5d2e32b71424a85a21f90327a676d68,
title = "Women and Turkish Cinema: gender politics, cultural identity and representation",
abstract = "There has been a significant recent increase in the number of English-language monographs on Turkish cinema. Savas Arslan’s Cinema in Turkey (2010), Asuman Suner’s New Turkish Cinema (2010) and Gonul Donmez-Colin’s specialized volumes (The Routledge Dictionary of Turkish Cinema, 2013; Turkish Cinema: identity, distance andbelonging; 2013) attest to this new proliferation. Eylem Atakav’s book focuses on women and Turkish cinema in the context of politics, cultural identity and representation. The book’s central claim is that enforced depoliticization introduced after the coup of 1980 is responsible for uniting feminism and film in Turkey. Atakav claims that the feminist movement was not perceived as politically significant during that decade, thus it was allowed to flourish. These films focused on individuals, on women’s issues and lives, while trying to avoid being perceived as overtly political.",
keywords = "women, film, cinema, gender, Turkish",
author = "Murat Akser",
note = "Reference text: Eylem Atakav. Women and Turkish Cinema: gender politics, cultural identity and representation, London, Routledge, 2013",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01439685.2013.852725",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "116--119",
journal = "Historical Journal of film, radio and television",
issn = "0143-9685",
number = "1",

}

Women and Turkish Cinema: gender politics, cultural identity and representation. / Akser, Murat.

In: Historical Journal of film, radio and television, Vol. 34, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 116-119.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Women and Turkish Cinema: gender politics, cultural identity and representation

AU - Akser, Murat

N1 - Reference text: Eylem Atakav. Women and Turkish Cinema: gender politics, cultural identity and representation, London, Routledge, 2013

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - There has been a significant recent increase in the number of English-language monographs on Turkish cinema. Savas Arslan’s Cinema in Turkey (2010), Asuman Suner’s New Turkish Cinema (2010) and Gonul Donmez-Colin’s specialized volumes (The Routledge Dictionary of Turkish Cinema, 2013; Turkish Cinema: identity, distance andbelonging; 2013) attest to this new proliferation. Eylem Atakav’s book focuses on women and Turkish cinema in the context of politics, cultural identity and representation. The book’s central claim is that enforced depoliticization introduced after the coup of 1980 is responsible for uniting feminism and film in Turkey. Atakav claims that the feminist movement was not perceived as politically significant during that decade, thus it was allowed to flourish. These films focused on individuals, on women’s issues and lives, while trying to avoid being perceived as overtly political.

AB - There has been a significant recent increase in the number of English-language monographs on Turkish cinema. Savas Arslan’s Cinema in Turkey (2010), Asuman Suner’s New Turkish Cinema (2010) and Gonul Donmez-Colin’s specialized volumes (The Routledge Dictionary of Turkish Cinema, 2013; Turkish Cinema: identity, distance andbelonging; 2013) attest to this new proliferation. Eylem Atakav’s book focuses on women and Turkish cinema in the context of politics, cultural identity and representation. The book’s central claim is that enforced depoliticization introduced after the coup of 1980 is responsible for uniting feminism and film in Turkey. Atakav claims that the feminist movement was not perceived as politically significant during that decade, thus it was allowed to flourish. These films focused on individuals, on women’s issues and lives, while trying to avoid being perceived as overtly political.

KW - women

KW - film

KW - cinema

KW - gender

KW - Turkish

UR - https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/en/searchAll/index/?search=11616657&pageSize=25&showAdvanced=false&allConcepts=true&inferConcepts=true&searchBy=PartOfNameOrTitle

U2 - 10.1080/01439685.2013.852725

DO - 10.1080/01439685.2013.852725

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 116

EP - 119

JO - Historical Journal of film, radio and television

T2 - Historical Journal of film, radio and television

JF - Historical Journal of film, radio and television

SN - 0143-9685

IS - 1

ER -