Abstract
Building on recent literature on the importance of local grounded comparison and the ‘fracturing’ of the penal state, this article argues that within-case comparison of the adult and youth justice systems can shed important light on the stark differences that persist in how and why we punish. Using the case of Irish youth justice to illustrate the utility of fracturing the penal state horizontally, as well as vertically, we argue that this provides a helpful lens for making sense of the drivers of penal policy, especially the historical particularities of any penal phenomenon.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | Criminology & Criminal Justice (CCJ) |
| Early online date | 21 Oct 2024 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 21 Oct 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© The Author(s) 2024.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/ or publication of this article: This research was funded by the Irish Research Council Government of Ireland Postgraduate Scholarship under project grant number ircb0bf19a4b96d87c3e211079bc144967c.
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Irish Research Council | ircb0bf19a4b96d87c3e211079bc144967c |
Keywords
- Adult justice
- Comparison
- Penal state
- Penality
- Youth justice
- comparison
- youth justice
- penal state
- penality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Within-case comparison of the adult and youth justice systems: New directions for a ‘fractured’ penal state?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver