Within-case comparison of the adult and youth justice systems: New directions for a ‘fractured’ penal state?

Siobhan Buckley, Claire Hamilton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Building on recent literature on the importance of local grounded comparison and the ‘fracturing’ of the penal state, this article argues that within-case comparison of the adult and youth justice systems can shed important light on the stark differences that persist in how and why we punish. Using the case of Irish youth justice to illustrate the utility of fracturing the penal state horizontally, as well as vertically, we argue that this provides a helpful lens for making sense of the drivers of penal policy, especially the historical particularities of any penal phenomenon.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages18
JournalCriminology & Criminal Justice
Early online date21 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 21 Oct 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.

Keywords

  • Adult justice
  • Comparison
  • Penal state
  • Penality
  • Youth justice
  • comparison
  • youth justice
  • penal state
  • penality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Within-case comparison of the adult and youth justice systems: New directions for a ‘fractured’ penal state?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this