Will Web Search Engines Replace Bibliographic Databases in the Systematic Identification of Research?

Jessica Bates, Paul Best, Janice McQuilkin, Brian Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The availability of web search engines offers opportunities in addition to those provided by bibliographic databasesfor identifying academic literature, but their usefulness for retrieving research is uncertain. A rigorous literaturesearch was undertaken to investigate whether web search engines might replace bibliographicdatabases, using empirical research in health and social care as a case study. Eight databases and five web searchengines were searched between 20 July and 6 August 2015. Sixteen unique studies which compared at least onedatabase with at least one web search engine were examined, as well as drawing lessons from the authors’ ownsearch process. Web search engines were limited in that the searcher cannot be certain that the principles ofBoolean logic apply and they were more limited than bibliographic databases in their functions, such as exportingabstracts. Recommendations are made for improving the rigour and quality of reporting studies of academic literaturesearching.
LanguageEnglish
Pages8-17
JournalJournal of Academic Librarianship
Volume43
Issue number1
Early online date27 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

search engine
empirical research
health

Keywords

  • Academic librarianship
  • Bibliographic databases
  • Google Scholar
  • Health research
  • Literature searching
  • Social care research
  • Systematic searching
  • Web search engines

Cite this

@article{2e25b818810b4fad8ec6660302fcaec7,
title = "Will Web Search Engines Replace Bibliographic Databases in the Systematic Identification of Research?",
abstract = "The availability of web search engines offers opportunities in addition to those provided by bibliographic databasesfor identifying academic literature, but their usefulness for retrieving research is uncertain. A rigorous literaturesearch was undertaken to investigate whether web search engines might replace bibliographicdatabases, using empirical research in health and social care as a case study. Eight databases and five web searchengines were searched between 20 July and 6 August 2015. Sixteen unique studies which compared at least onedatabase with at least one web search engine were examined, as well as drawing lessons from the authors’ ownsearch process. Web search engines were limited in that the searcher cannot be certain that the principles ofBoolean logic apply and they were more limited than bibliographic databases in their functions, such as exportingabstracts. Recommendations are made for improving the rigour and quality of reporting studies of academic literaturesearching.",
keywords = "Academic librarianship, Bibliographic databases, Google Scholar, Health research, Literature searching, Social care research, Systematic searching, Web search engines",
author = "Jessica Bates and Paul Best and Janice McQuilkin and Brian Taylor",
note = "UIR Compliant - evidence uploaded to other files",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1016/j.acalib.2016.11.003",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "8--17",
number = "1",

}

Will Web Search Engines Replace Bibliographic Databases in the Systematic Identification of Research? / Bates, Jessica; Best, Paul; McQuilkin, Janice; Taylor, Brian.

Vol. 43, No. 1, 31.01.2017, p. 8-17.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Will Web Search Engines Replace Bibliographic Databases in the Systematic Identification of Research?

AU - Bates, Jessica

AU - Best, Paul

AU - McQuilkin, Janice

AU - Taylor, Brian

N1 - UIR Compliant - evidence uploaded to other files

PY - 2017/1/31

Y1 - 2017/1/31

N2 - The availability of web search engines offers opportunities in addition to those provided by bibliographic databasesfor identifying academic literature, but their usefulness for retrieving research is uncertain. A rigorous literaturesearch was undertaken to investigate whether web search engines might replace bibliographicdatabases, using empirical research in health and social care as a case study. Eight databases and five web searchengines were searched between 20 July and 6 August 2015. Sixteen unique studies which compared at least onedatabase with at least one web search engine were examined, as well as drawing lessons from the authors’ ownsearch process. Web search engines were limited in that the searcher cannot be certain that the principles ofBoolean logic apply and they were more limited than bibliographic databases in their functions, such as exportingabstracts. Recommendations are made for improving the rigour and quality of reporting studies of academic literaturesearching.

AB - The availability of web search engines offers opportunities in addition to those provided by bibliographic databasesfor identifying academic literature, but their usefulness for retrieving research is uncertain. A rigorous literaturesearch was undertaken to investigate whether web search engines might replace bibliographicdatabases, using empirical research in health and social care as a case study. Eight databases and five web searchengines were searched between 20 July and 6 August 2015. Sixteen unique studies which compared at least onedatabase with at least one web search engine were examined, as well as drawing lessons from the authors’ ownsearch process. Web search engines were limited in that the searcher cannot be certain that the principles ofBoolean logic apply and they were more limited than bibliographic databases in their functions, such as exportingabstracts. Recommendations are made for improving the rigour and quality of reporting studies of academic literaturesearching.

KW - Academic librarianship

KW - Bibliographic databases

KW - Google Scholar

KW - Health research

KW - Literature searching

KW - Social care research

KW - Systematic searching

KW - Web search engines

U2 - 10.1016/j.acalib.2016.11.003

DO - 10.1016/j.acalib.2016.11.003

M3 - Article

VL - 43

SP - 8

EP - 17

IS - 1

ER -