Wild catastrophism to mild moderation in Northern Ireland

Arthur Aughey

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    Abstract

    To argue that we are already ‘after Britain’ suggests that the fate of Britishness has already been decided. This reading posits a static condition which concedes the continuing, if temporary, fact of the Union and a new dynamic nationalism. This state of mind can be called ‘endism’ and while it is disposed towards the future it assumes that history can be understood as an intelligible design, the constructive pattern of which reveals the end unfolding. It has always informed thinking about Northern Ireland, implicitly and explicitly. The ‘inevitability of Irish unity’ has haunted and continues to haunt political commentary. This Chapter takes a dissenting view and proposes a different perspective. It argues that this perspective allows a more subtle understanding of change since the Belfast (or Good Friday) Agreement of 1998.
    LanguageEnglish
    Title of host publicationBreaking Up Britain
    EditorsMark Perryman
    Pages76-85
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Fingerprint

    Fate
    Northern Ireland
    Unity
    Belfast
    State of Mind
    Britishness
    Political Commentary
    History
    Moderation
    Nationalism
    Catastrophism

    Cite this

    Aughey, A. (2009). Wild catastrophism to mild moderation in Northern Ireland. In M. Perryman (Ed.), Breaking Up Britain (pp. 76-85)
    Aughey, Arthur. / Wild catastrophism to mild moderation in Northern Ireland. Breaking Up Britain. editor / Mark Perryman. 2009. pp. 76-85
    @inbook{def8a323ca2e472d83b3762624744bcc,
    title = "Wild catastrophism to mild moderation in Northern Ireland",
    abstract = "To argue that we are already ‘after Britain’ suggests that the fate of Britishness has already been decided. This reading posits a static condition which concedes the continuing, if temporary, fact of the Union and a new dynamic nationalism. This state of mind can be called ‘endism’ and while it is disposed towards the future it assumes that history can be understood as an intelligible design, the constructive pattern of which reveals the end unfolding. It has always informed thinking about Northern Ireland, implicitly and explicitly. The ‘inevitability of Irish unity’ has haunted and continues to haunt political commentary. This Chapter takes a dissenting view and proposes a different perspective. It argues that this perspective allows a more subtle understanding of change since the Belfast (or Good Friday) Agreement of 1998.",
    author = "Arthur Aughey",
    year = "2009",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "9781905007967",
    pages = "76--85",
    editor = "Mark Perryman",
    booktitle = "Breaking Up Britain",

    }

    Aughey, A 2009, Wild catastrophism to mild moderation in Northern Ireland. in M Perryman (ed.), Breaking Up Britain. pp. 76-85.

    Wild catastrophism to mild moderation in Northern Ireland. / Aughey, Arthur.

    Breaking Up Britain. ed. / Mark Perryman. 2009. p. 76-85.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Wild catastrophism to mild moderation in Northern Ireland

    AU - Aughey, Arthur

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - To argue that we are already ‘after Britain’ suggests that the fate of Britishness has already been decided. This reading posits a static condition which concedes the continuing, if temporary, fact of the Union and a new dynamic nationalism. This state of mind can be called ‘endism’ and while it is disposed towards the future it assumes that history can be understood as an intelligible design, the constructive pattern of which reveals the end unfolding. It has always informed thinking about Northern Ireland, implicitly and explicitly. The ‘inevitability of Irish unity’ has haunted and continues to haunt political commentary. This Chapter takes a dissenting view and proposes a different perspective. It argues that this perspective allows a more subtle understanding of change since the Belfast (or Good Friday) Agreement of 1998.

    AB - To argue that we are already ‘after Britain’ suggests that the fate of Britishness has already been decided. This reading posits a static condition which concedes the continuing, if temporary, fact of the Union and a new dynamic nationalism. This state of mind can be called ‘endism’ and while it is disposed towards the future it assumes that history can be understood as an intelligible design, the constructive pattern of which reveals the end unfolding. It has always informed thinking about Northern Ireland, implicitly and explicitly. The ‘inevitability of Irish unity’ has haunted and continues to haunt political commentary. This Chapter takes a dissenting view and proposes a different perspective. It argues that this perspective allows a more subtle understanding of change since the Belfast (or Good Friday) Agreement of 1998.

    M3 - Chapter

    SN - 9781905007967

    SP - 76

    EP - 85

    BT - Breaking Up Britain

    A2 - Perryman, Mark

    ER -

    Aughey A. Wild catastrophism to mild moderation in Northern Ireland. In Perryman M, editor, Breaking Up Britain. 2009. p. 76-85