Why do you ask? A study of questioning behaviour in community pharmacist-client consultations

Norman Morrow, Owen Hargie, Helen Donnelly, Catherine Woodman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    30 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article reports the results of an analysis of recorded community pharmacist-client interactions. The results showed that 98 per cent of all pharmacist questions asked were closed, over two thirds of which were of the Yes/No variety. Twenty four per cent were leading in nature and almost all of these were subtle leads. Pharmacists asked, on average, four questions per consultation as compared with a mean of 2.5 for clients. Only 2 per cent of all pharmacist questions addressed the psychosocial dimensions of practice, the vast majority being concerned with purely clinical matters. The findings are discussed within the context of a communication audit approach to community pharmacy practice, directed to effecting improvements in the quality of interviewing performance in pharmacist-client consultations.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages90-94
    JournalInternational Journal of Pharmacy Practice
    Volume2
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1993

    Fingerprint

    pharmacist
    community
    audit
    communication
    interaction
    performance

    Cite this

    Morrow, Norman ; Hargie, Owen ; Donnelly, Helen ; Woodman, Catherine. / Why do you ask? A study of questioning behaviour in community pharmacist-client consultations. In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. 1993 ; Vol. 2, No. 2. pp. 90-94.
    @article{1fddc9f406154fe59360561afc836dbb,
    title = "Why do you ask? A study of questioning behaviour in community pharmacist-client consultations",
    abstract = "This article reports the results of an analysis of recorded community pharmacist-client interactions. The results showed that 98 per cent of all pharmacist questions asked were closed, over two thirds of which were of the Yes/No variety. Twenty four per cent were leading in nature and almost all of these were subtle leads. Pharmacists asked, on average, four questions per consultation as compared with a mean of 2.5 for clients. Only 2 per cent of all pharmacist questions addressed the psychosocial dimensions of practice, the vast majority being concerned with purely clinical matters. The findings are discussed within the context of a communication audit approach to community pharmacy practice, directed to effecting improvements in the quality of interviewing performance in pharmacist-client consultations.",
    author = "Norman Morrow and Owen Hargie and Helen Donnelly and Catherine Woodman",
    year = "1993",
    doi = "10.1111/j.2042-7174.1993.tb00732.x",
    language = "English",
    volume = "2",
    pages = "90--94",
    journal = "International Journal of Pharmacy Practice",
    issn = "0961-7671",
    number = "2",

    }

    Why do you ask? A study of questioning behaviour in community pharmacist-client consultations. / Morrow, Norman; Hargie, Owen; Donnelly, Helen; Woodman, Catherine.

    In: International Journal of Pharmacy Practice, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1993, p. 90-94.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Why do you ask? A study of questioning behaviour in community pharmacist-client consultations

    AU - Morrow, Norman

    AU - Hargie, Owen

    AU - Donnelly, Helen

    AU - Woodman, Catherine

    PY - 1993

    Y1 - 1993

    N2 - This article reports the results of an analysis of recorded community pharmacist-client interactions. The results showed that 98 per cent of all pharmacist questions asked were closed, over two thirds of which were of the Yes/No variety. Twenty four per cent were leading in nature and almost all of these were subtle leads. Pharmacists asked, on average, four questions per consultation as compared with a mean of 2.5 for clients. Only 2 per cent of all pharmacist questions addressed the psychosocial dimensions of practice, the vast majority being concerned with purely clinical matters. The findings are discussed within the context of a communication audit approach to community pharmacy practice, directed to effecting improvements in the quality of interviewing performance in pharmacist-client consultations.

    AB - This article reports the results of an analysis of recorded community pharmacist-client interactions. The results showed that 98 per cent of all pharmacist questions asked were closed, over two thirds of which were of the Yes/No variety. Twenty four per cent were leading in nature and almost all of these were subtle leads. Pharmacists asked, on average, four questions per consultation as compared with a mean of 2.5 for clients. Only 2 per cent of all pharmacist questions addressed the psychosocial dimensions of practice, the vast majority being concerned with purely clinical matters. The findings are discussed within the context of a communication audit approach to community pharmacy practice, directed to effecting improvements in the quality of interviewing performance in pharmacist-client consultations.

    U2 - 10.1111/j.2042-7174.1993.tb00732.x

    DO - 10.1111/j.2042-7174.1993.tb00732.x

    M3 - Article

    VL - 2

    SP - 90

    EP - 94

    JO - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

    T2 - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

    JF - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

    SN - 0961-7671

    IS - 2

    ER -