Whose Justice? Rethinking Transitional Justice from the Bottom Up

Patricia Lundy, M McGovern

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

116 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article argues that transitional justice needs to adopt a participatory approach to achieve longer-term sustainability, shifting away from the top-down 'one-size-fits-all' approach to allow 'voices from below' to be heard and heeded. It critiques dominant interpretations of key transitional justice concepts, and links them to the difficulties of post-conflict transitional justice in a range of violently divided societies.
LanguageEnglish
Pages265-292
JournalJournal of Law and Society
Volume35
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2008

Fingerprint

justice
sustainability
interpretation
society

Cite this

@article{925bafb49437430d907a44245b02bca6,
title = "Whose Justice? Rethinking Transitional Justice from the Bottom Up",
abstract = "This article argues that transitional justice needs to adopt a participatory approach to achieve longer-term sustainability, shifting away from the top-down 'one-size-fits-all' approach to allow 'voices from below' to be heard and heeded. It critiques dominant interpretations of key transitional justice concepts, and links them to the difficulties of post-conflict transitional justice in a range of violently divided societies.",
author = "Patricia Lundy and M McGovern",
year = "2008",
month = "6",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "265--292",
journal = "Journal of Law and Society",
issn = "0263-323X",
number = "2",

}

Whose Justice? Rethinking Transitional Justice from the Bottom Up. / Lundy, Patricia; McGovern, M.

In: Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 35, No. 2, 06.2008, p. 265-292.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Whose Justice? Rethinking Transitional Justice from the Bottom Up

AU - Lundy, Patricia

AU - McGovern, M

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - This article argues that transitional justice needs to adopt a participatory approach to achieve longer-term sustainability, shifting away from the top-down 'one-size-fits-all' approach to allow 'voices from below' to be heard and heeded. It critiques dominant interpretations of key transitional justice concepts, and links them to the difficulties of post-conflict transitional justice in a range of violently divided societies.

AB - This article argues that transitional justice needs to adopt a participatory approach to achieve longer-term sustainability, shifting away from the top-down 'one-size-fits-all' approach to allow 'voices from below' to be heard and heeded. It critiques dominant interpretations of key transitional justice concepts, and links them to the difficulties of post-conflict transitional justice in a range of violently divided societies.

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 265

EP - 292

JO - Journal of Law and Society

T2 - Journal of Law and Society

JF - Journal of Law and Society

SN - 0263-323X

IS - 2

ER -