Who ‘Owns’ the Game? A critical reflection on membership owned models of football governance

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

A significant body of literature has emerged over the past decade contrasting the supposed benefits of a move towards a membership owned/ mutual governance model for sporting clubs in the UK and Ireland (as well as elsewhere throughout Europe). In many cases it is presented as something of a utopian response to the apparent unrelenting commercialisation of sport, mostly association football, and is viewed as something of a final opportunity for supporters of professional (and semi-professional) teams to retain a stake in the welfare and future direction of the clubs to which they are closely tied. This paper recognises the inherent benefits of implementing such a model of sport governance, especially to ‘failing’ clubs, but outlines a number of reasons as to why we should remain cautious about assuming that, in the face of a range of competing models of governance, that a membership-owned approach is necessarily better or more desirable.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationUnknown Host Publication
Number of pages16
Publication statusPublished - 24 Jul 2014
EventFIFA World Cup and the Nation: Culture, Politics, Identity - Oxford University
Duration: 24 Jul 2014 → …

Conference

ConferenceFIFA World Cup and the Nation: Culture, Politics, Identity
Period24/07/14 → …

Fingerprint

clubs
governance
sports association
commercialization
Ireland
Sports
welfare

Keywords

  • Football governance
  • membership models of governance
  • GAA

Cite this

@inproceedings{042a1a2a77904a05a4ddd8d76440f4a5,
title = "Who ‘Owns’ the Game? A critical reflection on membership owned models of football governance",
abstract = "A significant body of literature has emerged over the past decade contrasting the supposed benefits of a move towards a membership owned/ mutual governance model for sporting clubs in the UK and Ireland (as well as elsewhere throughout Europe). In many cases it is presented as something of a utopian response to the apparent unrelenting commercialisation of sport, mostly association football, and is viewed as something of a final opportunity for supporters of professional (and semi-professional) teams to retain a stake in the welfare and future direction of the clubs to which they are closely tied. This paper recognises the inherent benefits of implementing such a model of sport governance, especially to ‘failing’ clubs, but outlines a number of reasons as to why we should remain cautious about assuming that, in the face of a range of competing models of governance, that a membership-owned approach is necessarily better or more desirable.",
keywords = "Football governance, membership models of governance, GAA",
author = "David Hassan",
year = "2014",
month = "7",
day = "24",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Unknown Host Publication",

}

Hassan, D 2014, Who ‘Owns’ the Game? A critical reflection on membership owned models of football governance. in Unknown Host Publication. FIFA World Cup and the Nation: Culture, Politics, Identity, 24/07/14.

Who ‘Owns’ the Game? A critical reflection on membership owned models of football governance. / Hassan, David.

Unknown Host Publication. 2014.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Who ‘Owns’ the Game? A critical reflection on membership owned models of football governance

AU - Hassan, David

PY - 2014/7/24

Y1 - 2014/7/24

N2 - A significant body of literature has emerged over the past decade contrasting the supposed benefits of a move towards a membership owned/ mutual governance model for sporting clubs in the UK and Ireland (as well as elsewhere throughout Europe). In many cases it is presented as something of a utopian response to the apparent unrelenting commercialisation of sport, mostly association football, and is viewed as something of a final opportunity for supporters of professional (and semi-professional) teams to retain a stake in the welfare and future direction of the clubs to which they are closely tied. This paper recognises the inherent benefits of implementing such a model of sport governance, especially to ‘failing’ clubs, but outlines a number of reasons as to why we should remain cautious about assuming that, in the face of a range of competing models of governance, that a membership-owned approach is necessarily better or more desirable.

AB - A significant body of literature has emerged over the past decade contrasting the supposed benefits of a move towards a membership owned/ mutual governance model for sporting clubs in the UK and Ireland (as well as elsewhere throughout Europe). In many cases it is presented as something of a utopian response to the apparent unrelenting commercialisation of sport, mostly association football, and is viewed as something of a final opportunity for supporters of professional (and semi-professional) teams to retain a stake in the welfare and future direction of the clubs to which they are closely tied. This paper recognises the inherent benefits of implementing such a model of sport governance, especially to ‘failing’ clubs, but outlines a number of reasons as to why we should remain cautious about assuming that, in the face of a range of competing models of governance, that a membership-owned approach is necessarily better or more desirable.

KW - Football governance

KW - membership models of governance

KW - GAA

M3 - Conference contribution

BT - Unknown Host Publication

ER -