What can we learn from historical pandemics? A systematic review of the literature

Aine Doran, Christopher Colvin, Eoin McLaughlin

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)
56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

What are the insights from historical pandemics for policymaking today? We carry out a systematic review of the literature on the impact of pandemics that occurred since the Industrial Revolution and prior to Covid-19. Our literature searches were conducted between June 2020 and September 2023, with the final review encompassing 169 research papers selected for their relevance to understanding either the demographic or economic impact of pandemics. We include literature from across disciplines to maximise our knowledge base, finding many relevant articles in journals which would not normally be on the radar of social scientists. Our review identifies two gaps in the literature: (1) the need to study pandemics and their effects more collectively rather than looking at them in isolation; and (2) the need for more study of pandemics besides 1918 Spanish Influenza, especially milder pandemic episodes. These gaps are a consequence of academics working in silos, failing to draw on the skills and knowledge offered by other disciplines. Synthesising existing knowledge on pandemics in one place provides a basis upon which to identify the lessons in preparing for future catastrophic disease events.
Original languageEnglish
Article number116534
Pages (from-to)1-19
Number of pages19
JournalSocial Science and Medicine
Volume342
Early online date26 Dec 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 6 Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • systematic review
  • historical pandemics
  • mortality
  • interdisciplinary research
  • 1918 Spanish Influenza

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What can we learn from historical pandemics? A systematic review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this