Abstract
This article reports research on bureaucrat behaviour. Where discretion exists, doprimary associations such as religious, gender or racial identity guide behaviour orare these associations superseded by secondary learned professional or technocraticattachments? Using the theoretical lens of representative bureaucracy and Q methodologyto investigate bureaucrat role perceptions, two distinct bureaucrat typologies areidentified in Belfast. The evidence demonstrates that an elite-level bureaucrat mayactively represent his or her own professional interests or, alternatively, may seekout and actively represent the interests of the political elite as a collective. The findingshave implications for representative bureaucracy research as it is demonstrated that anelite-level bureaucrat may actively represent something other than a primary identity.This contribution also provides a useful insight into everyday life within a bureau of asuccessful power-sharing system of governance.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-22 |
Journal | International Review of Administrative Sciences |
Volume | 83 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 16 Jul 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 1 Mar 2017 |
Keywords
- Belfast
- conflict management
- elite-level bureaucrat
- public administration
- representative
- bureaucracy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'What are the ideas and motivations of bureaucrats within a religiously contested society?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Karl O'Connor
- School of Applied Social and Policy Sc. - Professor
- Faculty of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences - Research Director (Social Work and Social Policy)
Person: Academic