Wave influences in contemporary and Mesoarchaean stromatolites

Alan Smith, Andrew Cooper, lisa Guastella, Vishal Bharath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Contemporary shore platform stromatolites (SPS) are becoming well known. We describe the physical environment and macrostructures from contemporary shore platform stromatolites (SPS) on the wave-dominated southeast African coast. This was then compared with Mesoarchaean (2.97 Ga) stromatolites from White Umfolozi (100 km inland). We use the Tinley Manor SPS occurrence as the basis for physical environmental comparison, but where necessary draw on evidence from other SPS environments. SPS and Mesoarchean Umfolozi stromatolites contain similar stromatolitic structures and wave deposits. The SPS environment is wave dominated and the occurrence of similar sedimentary structures associated with the Mesoarchean Umfolozi Stromatolites indicates a paleoenvironment associated with waves. The contemporary Tinley Manor SPS wave climate is robust and from this locality we have identified broad limits in which SPS can develop and be preserved. Applying this knowledge to the Mesoarchaean White Umfolozi stromatolites suggests that they formed in a protected wave climate where wave incursions were less frequent. Both these wave-influenced settings are/were subject to very-low siliciclastic-input. The frequency of marine sediment input appears to be a limiting factor on microbialite growth in both the contemporary SPS and Archaean examples.
LanguageEnglish
JournalSedimentary Geology
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 11 Nov 2019

Fingerprint

shore platform
wave climate
microbialite
sedimentary structure
paleoenvironment
limiting factor
marine sediment
Archean

Cite this

Smith, A., Cooper, A., Guastella, L., & Bharath, V. (Accepted/In press). Wave influences in contemporary and Mesoarchaean stromatolites. Sedimentary Geology.
@article{b1a9f331041241cc84073f23b12d362f,
title = "Wave influences in contemporary and Mesoarchaean stromatolites",
abstract = "Contemporary shore platform stromatolites (SPS) are becoming well known. We describe the physical environment and macrostructures from contemporary shore platform stromatolites (SPS) on the wave-dominated southeast African coast. This was then compared with Mesoarchaean (2.97 Ga) stromatolites from White Umfolozi (100 km inland). We use the Tinley Manor SPS occurrence as the basis for physical environmental comparison, but where necessary draw on evidence from other SPS environments. SPS and Mesoarchean Umfolozi stromatolites contain similar stromatolitic structures and wave deposits. The SPS environment is wave dominated and the occurrence of similar sedimentary structures associated with the Mesoarchean Umfolozi Stromatolites indicates a paleoenvironment associated with waves. The contemporary Tinley Manor SPS wave climate is robust and from this locality we have identified broad limits in which SPS can develop and be preserved. Applying this knowledge to the Mesoarchaean White Umfolozi stromatolites suggests that they formed in a protected wave climate where wave incursions were less frequent. Both these wave-influenced settings are/were subject to very-low siliciclastic-input. The frequency of marine sediment input appears to be a limiting factor on microbialite growth in both the contemporary SPS and Archaean examples.",
author = "Alan Smith and Andrew Cooper and lisa Guastella and Vishal Bharath",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "11",
language = "English",
journal = "Sedimentary Geology",
issn = "0037-0738",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Wave influences in contemporary and Mesoarchaean stromatolites. / Smith, Alan; Cooper, Andrew; Guastella, lisa; Bharath, Vishal.

In: Sedimentary Geology, 11.11.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wave influences in contemporary and Mesoarchaean stromatolites

AU - Smith, Alan

AU - Cooper, Andrew

AU - Guastella, lisa

AU - Bharath, Vishal

PY - 2019/11/11

Y1 - 2019/11/11

N2 - Contemporary shore platform stromatolites (SPS) are becoming well known. We describe the physical environment and macrostructures from contemporary shore platform stromatolites (SPS) on the wave-dominated southeast African coast. This was then compared with Mesoarchaean (2.97 Ga) stromatolites from White Umfolozi (100 km inland). We use the Tinley Manor SPS occurrence as the basis for physical environmental comparison, but where necessary draw on evidence from other SPS environments. SPS and Mesoarchean Umfolozi stromatolites contain similar stromatolitic structures and wave deposits. The SPS environment is wave dominated and the occurrence of similar sedimentary structures associated with the Mesoarchean Umfolozi Stromatolites indicates a paleoenvironment associated with waves. The contemporary Tinley Manor SPS wave climate is robust and from this locality we have identified broad limits in which SPS can develop and be preserved. Applying this knowledge to the Mesoarchaean White Umfolozi stromatolites suggests that they formed in a protected wave climate where wave incursions were less frequent. Both these wave-influenced settings are/were subject to very-low siliciclastic-input. The frequency of marine sediment input appears to be a limiting factor on microbialite growth in both the contemporary SPS and Archaean examples.

AB - Contemporary shore platform stromatolites (SPS) are becoming well known. We describe the physical environment and macrostructures from contemporary shore platform stromatolites (SPS) on the wave-dominated southeast African coast. This was then compared with Mesoarchaean (2.97 Ga) stromatolites from White Umfolozi (100 km inland). We use the Tinley Manor SPS occurrence as the basis for physical environmental comparison, but where necessary draw on evidence from other SPS environments. SPS and Mesoarchean Umfolozi stromatolites contain similar stromatolitic structures and wave deposits. The SPS environment is wave dominated and the occurrence of similar sedimentary structures associated with the Mesoarchean Umfolozi Stromatolites indicates a paleoenvironment associated with waves. The contemporary Tinley Manor SPS wave climate is robust and from this locality we have identified broad limits in which SPS can develop and be preserved. Applying this knowledge to the Mesoarchaean White Umfolozi stromatolites suggests that they formed in a protected wave climate where wave incursions were less frequent. Both these wave-influenced settings are/were subject to very-low siliciclastic-input. The frequency of marine sediment input appears to be a limiting factor on microbialite growth in both the contemporary SPS and Archaean examples.

M3 - Article

JO - Sedimentary Geology

T2 - Sedimentary Geology

JF - Sedimentary Geology

SN - 0037-0738

ER -