Watching the watchers: Conducting ethnographic research on covert police investigation in the United Kingdom

Shane Mac Giollabhui, Bethan Loftus, Benjamin Goold

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)
104 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

It has long been claimed that the police are the most visible symbol of the criminal justice system (Bittner, 1974). There is, however, a significant strand of policing – covert investigation that relies routinely on methods of deception – that resists public revelation (Ross, 2008). The growing importance of covert police investigation has profound implications for the relationship between citizen and the state in a democratic society, but it is relatively unexplored by police researchers. In this article, we describe the methodology of the first ethnographic study of how the introduction of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (2000) – a piece of ‘enabling’ legislation that regulates the conditions under which law enforcement agencies can intervene in the privacy of individuals – has effected the conduct of covert police investigation in the United Kingdom. We describe our ethnographic experience in the ‘secret world’ of covert policing, which is familiar in many respects to ethnographers of uniformed officers, but which also differed significantly. We contend that the organizing principle of surveillance – the imperative to maintain the secrecy of an operation – had a marked impact on our ethnographic experience, which eroded significantly our status as non-participant observers and altered out reflexive experience by activating the ‘usefulness’ of our gender.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2
Pages (from-to)630-645
Number of pages15
JournalQualitative Research
Volume16
Issue number6
Early online date3 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 1 Dec 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Watching the watchers: Conducting ethnographic research on covert police investigation in the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this