'Walk[ing] the Halls of Power'? Understanding Women's Participation in International Peace and Security

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

Abstract

The prioritisation of women’s participation in the Women, Peace and Security agenda inaugurated by Resolution 1325 has marked a watershed: feminist demands have been articulated in terms that have been accepted by the institutions and processes of international peace and security. Critiques, however, of the focus on participation — that either question the quality of the gains delivered, or the wisdom of prioritising participation in unreformed institutions — suggest a need for greater conceptual clarity around participation as an objective and outcome in feminist engagement with international peace and security. This article draws on arguments for women’s participation in feminist political theory in order to delineate five meanings of participation within the Women, Peace and Security Resolutions, namely: participation as the presence of role models; participation as representation; participation as deliberation; participation as inclusion; and participation as expertise. This article finds that the text of the Resolutions evidence erroneous interpretation and application of feminist arguments for participation, with the result that the Resolutions prioritise the advancement of a presumed set of ‘women’s interests’ in peace and security over the actual presence of women in peace and security decision-making.
LanguageEnglish
Pages128-154
JournalMelbourne Journal of International Law
Volume15
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2014

Fingerprint

peace
participation
role model
political theory
deliberation
wisdom
expertise
inclusion
decision making
interpretation

Keywords

  • Feminism
  • International Law
  • Women
  • Peace and Security
  • Participation

Cite this

@article{40bc98b06bef4550adb7ab0d6aa8d4ae,
title = "'Walk[ing] the Halls of Power'? Understanding Women's Participation in International Peace and Security",
abstract = "The prioritisation of women’s participation in the Women, Peace and Security agenda inaugurated by Resolution 1325 has marked a watershed: feminist demands have been articulated in terms that have been accepted by the institutions and processes of international peace and security. Critiques, however, of the focus on participation — that either question the quality of the gains delivered, or the wisdom of prioritising participation in unreformed institutions — suggest a need for greater conceptual clarity around participation as an objective and outcome in feminist engagement with international peace and security. This article draws on arguments for women’s participation in feminist political theory in order to delineate five meanings of participation within the Women, Peace and Security Resolutions, namely: participation as the presence of role models; participation as representation; participation as deliberation; participation as inclusion; and participation as expertise. This article finds that the text of the Resolutions evidence erroneous interpretation and application of feminist arguments for participation, with the result that the Resolutions prioritise the advancement of a presumed set of ‘women’s interests’ in peace and security over the actual presence of women in peace and security decision-making.",
keywords = "Feminism, International Law, Women, Peace and Security, Participation",
author = "Catherine O'Rourke",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
volume = "15",
pages = "128--154",
number = "1",

}

'Walk[ing] the Halls of Power'? Understanding Women's Participation in International Peace and Security. / O'Rourke, Catherine.

Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.06.2014, p. 128-154.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'Walk[ing] the Halls of Power'? Understanding Women's Participation in International Peace and Security

AU - O'Rourke,Catherine

PY - 2014/6/1

Y1 - 2014/6/1

N2 - The prioritisation of women’s participation in the Women, Peace and Security agenda inaugurated by Resolution 1325 has marked a watershed: feminist demands have been articulated in terms that have been accepted by the institutions and processes of international peace and security. Critiques, however, of the focus on participation — that either question the quality of the gains delivered, or the wisdom of prioritising participation in unreformed institutions — suggest a need for greater conceptual clarity around participation as an objective and outcome in feminist engagement with international peace and security. This article draws on arguments for women’s participation in feminist political theory in order to delineate five meanings of participation within the Women, Peace and Security Resolutions, namely: participation as the presence of role models; participation as representation; participation as deliberation; participation as inclusion; and participation as expertise. This article finds that the text of the Resolutions evidence erroneous interpretation and application of feminist arguments for participation, with the result that the Resolutions prioritise the advancement of a presumed set of ‘women’s interests’ in peace and security over the actual presence of women in peace and security decision-making.

AB - The prioritisation of women’s participation in the Women, Peace and Security agenda inaugurated by Resolution 1325 has marked a watershed: feminist demands have been articulated in terms that have been accepted by the institutions and processes of international peace and security. Critiques, however, of the focus on participation — that either question the quality of the gains delivered, or the wisdom of prioritising participation in unreformed institutions — suggest a need for greater conceptual clarity around participation as an objective and outcome in feminist engagement with international peace and security. This article draws on arguments for women’s participation in feminist political theory in order to delineate five meanings of participation within the Women, Peace and Security Resolutions, namely: participation as the presence of role models; participation as representation; participation as deliberation; participation as inclusion; and participation as expertise. This article finds that the text of the Resolutions evidence erroneous interpretation and application of feminist arguments for participation, with the result that the Resolutions prioritise the advancement of a presumed set of ‘women’s interests’ in peace and security over the actual presence of women in peace and security decision-making.

KW - Feminism

KW - International Law

KW - Women

KW - Peace and Security

KW - Participation

UR - http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/files/dmfile/ORourke-Depaginated2.pdf

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 128

EP - 154

IS - 1

ER -