Visual Acuity Assessment of Children with Neurological Impairment Using Grating and Vanishing Optotype Acuity Cards

R T Mackie, Kathryn Saunders, R E Day, G N Dutton, D L McCulloch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We have compared the testability and acuity thresholds achieved with vanishing optotype acuity cards and traditional grating acuity cards when used to examine children with neurological impairment. These children encompass a wide range of ages and abilities and it may be desirable to use the two types of cards for acuity assessment. Subjects were a diverse group of children (n = 91; 8 months-19 years) whose learning ability ranged from normal to severe disability. There was no significant difference between the individual success rates for the two sets of cards (grating 91% (n = 61) vanishing optotype 89% (n = 59)). Over a wide range of acuities (0 to 2.0 LogMAR) the mean difference between acuity thresholds did not differ significantly from zero (p = 0.24). Ninety-three percent of acuity estimates agreed to within +/- 0.50 LogMAR units. The results indicate that the two acuity tests could be used interchangeably in clinical populations of children with neurological impairment.
LanguageEnglish
Pages483-7
JournalActa ophthalmologica Scandinavica
Volume74
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 1996

Fingerprint

Visual Acuity
Aptitude
Individuality
Learning
Population

Cite this

@article{c43ff1cf65f84d179192022bb3d4596e,
title = "Visual Acuity Assessment of Children with Neurological Impairment Using Grating and Vanishing Optotype Acuity Cards",
abstract = "We have compared the testability and acuity thresholds achieved with vanishing optotype acuity cards and traditional grating acuity cards when used to examine children with neurological impairment. These children encompass a wide range of ages and abilities and it may be desirable to use the two types of cards for acuity assessment. Subjects were a diverse group of children (n = 91; 8 months-19 years) whose learning ability ranged from normal to severe disability. There was no significant difference between the individual success rates for the two sets of cards (grating 91{\%} (n = 61) vanishing optotype 89{\%} (n = 59)). Over a wide range of acuities (0 to 2.0 LogMAR) the mean difference between acuity thresholds did not differ significantly from zero (p = 0.24). Ninety-three percent of acuity estimates agreed to within +/- 0.50 LogMAR units. The results indicate that the two acuity tests could be used interchangeably in clinical populations of children with neurological impairment.",
author = "Mackie, {R T} and Kathryn Saunders and Day, {R E} and Dutton, {G N} and McCulloch, {D L}",
year = "1996",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "483--7",
journal = "Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica",
issn = "1395-3907",
number = "5",

}

Visual Acuity Assessment of Children with Neurological Impairment Using Grating and Vanishing Optotype Acuity Cards. / Mackie, R T; Saunders, Kathryn; Day, R E; Dutton, G N; McCulloch, D L.

In: Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica, Vol. 74, No. 5, 1996, p. 483-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Visual Acuity Assessment of Children with Neurological Impairment Using Grating and Vanishing Optotype Acuity Cards

AU - Mackie, R T

AU - Saunders, Kathryn

AU - Day, R E

AU - Dutton, G N

AU - McCulloch, D L

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - We have compared the testability and acuity thresholds achieved with vanishing optotype acuity cards and traditional grating acuity cards when used to examine children with neurological impairment. These children encompass a wide range of ages and abilities and it may be desirable to use the two types of cards for acuity assessment. Subjects were a diverse group of children (n = 91; 8 months-19 years) whose learning ability ranged from normal to severe disability. There was no significant difference between the individual success rates for the two sets of cards (grating 91% (n = 61) vanishing optotype 89% (n = 59)). Over a wide range of acuities (0 to 2.0 LogMAR) the mean difference between acuity thresholds did not differ significantly from zero (p = 0.24). Ninety-three percent of acuity estimates agreed to within +/- 0.50 LogMAR units. The results indicate that the two acuity tests could be used interchangeably in clinical populations of children with neurological impairment.

AB - We have compared the testability and acuity thresholds achieved with vanishing optotype acuity cards and traditional grating acuity cards when used to examine children with neurological impairment. These children encompass a wide range of ages and abilities and it may be desirable to use the two types of cards for acuity assessment. Subjects were a diverse group of children (n = 91; 8 months-19 years) whose learning ability ranged from normal to severe disability. There was no significant difference between the individual success rates for the two sets of cards (grating 91% (n = 61) vanishing optotype 89% (n = 59)). Over a wide range of acuities (0 to 2.0 LogMAR) the mean difference between acuity thresholds did not differ significantly from zero (p = 0.24). Ninety-three percent of acuity estimates agreed to within +/- 0.50 LogMAR units. The results indicate that the two acuity tests could be used interchangeably in clinical populations of children with neurological impairment.

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 483

EP - 487

JO - Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica

T2 - Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica

JF - Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica

SN - 1395-3907

IS - 5

ER -