Virtual Learning Environments in teacher education: a journal, a journey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) in teacher education have a short history which is little longer than that of this journal. Twenty years ago they were the province of early adopters only and limited to email and, more unusually, asynchronous conferencing. Today, VLEs are widespread and mainstream, sophisticated and officially sanctioned components of many courses. Research in this field has borne some of the hallmarks of Underwood’s seminal critique of research in education technology more generally, namely, failure to construct and build upon the history of the field; failure to use the language and theoretical perspectives of the field; a focus on technology rather than on its impact on practice; and an over-reliance on qualitative methods. The three snapshots which are used as a basis of the study show, to an extent, that the technology has moved from unreliable and primitive, to reliable, ambient and versatile. Less obvious in these snapshots are any substantial changes in pedagogy over time although social learning theories seem to have increasing prevalence in support of collaborative learning praxis. Throughout the sample, it is notable that the impact of teachers’ online learning on teaching and learning in schools is still relatively rarely investigated.
LanguageEnglish
Pages121-131
JournalTechnology, Pedagogy and Education
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

learning environment
Education
teacher
learning
education
Electronic mail
social learning
learning theory
history
qualitative method
Teaching
language
school
time

Keywords

  • VLEs
  • Teacher Education

Cite this

@article{f7a9b21463344fb1a2f967f104aae922,
title = "Virtual Learning Environments in teacher education: a journal, a journey",
abstract = "Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) in teacher education have a short history which is little longer than that of this journal. Twenty years ago they were the province of early adopters only and limited to email and, more unusually, asynchronous conferencing. Today, VLEs are widespread and mainstream, sophisticated and officially sanctioned components of many courses. Research in this field has borne some of the hallmarks of Underwood’s seminal critique of research in education technology more generally, namely, failure to construct and build upon the history of the field; failure to use the language and theoretical perspectives of the field; a focus on technology rather than on its impact on practice; and an over-reliance on qualitative methods. The three snapshots which are used as a basis of the study show, to an extent, that the technology has moved from unreliable and primitive, to reliable, ambient and versatile. Less obvious in these snapshots are any substantial changes in pedagogy over time although social learning theories seem to have increasing prevalence in support of collaborative learning praxis. Throughout the sample, it is notable that the impact of teachers’ online learning on teaching and learning in schools is still relatively rarely investigated.",
keywords = "VLEs, Teacher Education",
author = "Linda Clarke",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1080/1475939X.2012.731632",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "121--131",
journal = "Technology, Pedagogy and Education",
issn = "1475-939X",
number = "1",

}

Virtual Learning Environments in teacher education: a journal, a journey. / Clarke, Linda.

In: Technology, Pedagogy and Education, Vol. 22, No. 1, 2013, p. 121-131.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Virtual Learning Environments in teacher education: a journal, a journey

AU - Clarke, Linda

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) in teacher education have a short history which is little longer than that of this journal. Twenty years ago they were the province of early adopters only and limited to email and, more unusually, asynchronous conferencing. Today, VLEs are widespread and mainstream, sophisticated and officially sanctioned components of many courses. Research in this field has borne some of the hallmarks of Underwood’s seminal critique of research in education technology more generally, namely, failure to construct and build upon the history of the field; failure to use the language and theoretical perspectives of the field; a focus on technology rather than on its impact on practice; and an over-reliance on qualitative methods. The three snapshots which are used as a basis of the study show, to an extent, that the technology has moved from unreliable and primitive, to reliable, ambient and versatile. Less obvious in these snapshots are any substantial changes in pedagogy over time although social learning theories seem to have increasing prevalence in support of collaborative learning praxis. Throughout the sample, it is notable that the impact of teachers’ online learning on teaching and learning in schools is still relatively rarely investigated.

AB - Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs) in teacher education have a short history which is little longer than that of this journal. Twenty years ago they were the province of early adopters only and limited to email and, more unusually, asynchronous conferencing. Today, VLEs are widespread and mainstream, sophisticated and officially sanctioned components of many courses. Research in this field has borne some of the hallmarks of Underwood’s seminal critique of research in education technology more generally, namely, failure to construct and build upon the history of the field; failure to use the language and theoretical perspectives of the field; a focus on technology rather than on its impact on practice; and an over-reliance on qualitative methods. The three snapshots which are used as a basis of the study show, to an extent, that the technology has moved from unreliable and primitive, to reliable, ambient and versatile. Less obvious in these snapshots are any substantial changes in pedagogy over time although social learning theories seem to have increasing prevalence in support of collaborative learning praxis. Throughout the sample, it is notable that the impact of teachers’ online learning on teaching and learning in schools is still relatively rarely investigated.

KW - VLEs

KW - Teacher Education

U2 - 10.1080/1475939X.2012.731632

DO - 10.1080/1475939X.2012.731632

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 121

EP - 131

JO - Technology, Pedagogy and Education

T2 - Technology, Pedagogy and Education

JF - Technology, Pedagogy and Education

SN - 1475-939X

IS - 1

ER -