TY - JOUR
T1 - Using a template to improve the accuracy and efficiency of the Jebsen-Taylor hand function test: a comparative study.
AU - Harte, D
AU - Curran, D
AU - Hamill, Philip
AU - Porter-Armstrong, Alison
AU - Wilson, L
PY - 2014/3/1
Y1 - 2014/3/1
N2 - Introduction: The Jebsen–Taylor Hand Function Test is a standardised assessment that relies upon precise test administrationthrough the placement of a number of small items in each subset. This set up has been criticised in the literatureas being time consuming and open to non-precision error in item placement. This study investigates whether applicationof a novel template board to the testing procedure of the Jebsen–Taylor Hand Function Test enhances accuracy andreduces the clinical time taken to administer the test when compared to non-template-based testing practices.Methods: The template board was marked to highlight where each test item should precisely be located during subtestadministration. Additionally, three therapists completed 10 timed trials each in test preparation and setting up subtests 2,3, 6 and 7 with and without the template to assess efficiency.Results: Results show that set up without using a template resulted in an average total of 10% accuracy in subtest 2, 0%accuracy in subtest 3 and 3.33% accuracy in subtests 6 and 7. The acceptable value on these tests to demonstrateaccuracy is 100% (p
AB - Introduction: The Jebsen–Taylor Hand Function Test is a standardised assessment that relies upon precise test administrationthrough the placement of a number of small items in each subset. This set up has been criticised in the literatureas being time consuming and open to non-precision error in item placement. This study investigates whether applicationof a novel template board to the testing procedure of the Jebsen–Taylor Hand Function Test enhances accuracy andreduces the clinical time taken to administer the test when compared to non-template-based testing practices.Methods: The template board was marked to highlight where each test item should precisely be located during subtestadministration. Additionally, three therapists completed 10 timed trials each in test preparation and setting up subtests 2,3, 6 and 7 with and without the template to assess efficiency.Results: Results show that set up without using a template resulted in an average total of 10% accuracy in subtest 2, 0%accuracy in subtest 3 and 3.33% accuracy in subtests 6 and 7. The acceptable value on these tests to demonstrateaccuracy is 100% (p
UR - https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/en/searchAll/index/?search=11422525&pageSize=25&showAdvanced=false&allConcepts=true&inferConcepts=true&searchBy=PartOfNameOrTitle
U2 - 10.1177/1758998314522435
DO - 10.1177/1758998314522435
M3 - Article
VL - 19
SP - 11
EP - 16
JO - Journal of Hand Therapy
JF - Journal of Hand Therapy
IS - 1
ER -
