Urban Globalism versus Rural Artisans: Sustainable Practices of Making

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

This text discusses the regeneration and re-evaluation of the handmade and craft cultures as a means of sustaining the cultural heritage and identity of Moldavian, Transilvanian and Maramures artisan communities.The analysis looks at the revival of crafts and their role as sustainable methods of production in the Romanian counties. The focus is on craft production as a cooperative system of making, sustaining traditional ways of life (where home is self-sufficient model of production and consumption). It investigates the regeneration of the handmade culture as a means of sustaining the cultural heritage and identity of Romanian artisan communities; and the concept of the folk market as a potential mechanism for elevating the production and circulation of craft products in a ‘closed economy’.

Conference

ConferenceMaking Futures 2009, International Conference - The Crafts in the Context of Emerging Global Sustainability Agendas
Period18/09/10 → …
Internet address

Fingerprint

cultural identity
cultural heritage
Moldavian
cooperative system
way of life
community
economy
market
evaluation

Keywords

  • hand-made culture
  • folk market
  • craft production
  • 'closec-economy'
  • self-sufficient production

Cite this

IONASCU, ADRIANA. (2010). Urban Globalism versus Rural Artisans: Sustainable Practices of Making. In Unknown Host Publication (Vol. n/a, pp. 1-7)
@inproceedings{0edde7833f1749d4bf5217943094798a,
title = "Urban Globalism versus Rural Artisans: Sustainable Practices of Making",
abstract = "This text discusses the regeneration and re-evaluation of the handmade and craft cultures as a means of sustaining the cultural heritage and identity of Moldavian, Transilvanian and Maramures artisan communities.The analysis looks at the revival of crafts and their role as sustainable methods of production in the Romanian counties. The focus is on craft production as a cooperative system of making, sustaining traditional ways of life (where home is self-sufficient model of production and consumption). It investigates the regeneration of the handmade culture as a means of sustaining the cultural heritage and identity of Romanian artisan communities; and the concept of the folk market as a potential mechanism for elevating the production and circulation of craft products in a ‘closed economy’.",
keywords = "hand-made culture, folk market, craft production, 'closec-economy', self-sufficient production",
author = "ADRIANA IONASCU",
note = "Reference text: 1. As Grace-Lees Maffei said, the production of ‘home crafts’ is relevant in “engaging issues of public and private domesticities” 2. Like pottery or woodcarving, of woven or embroidered costumes 3. The leather, linen and wool obtained in the home were used for making domestic woven cloth. 4. Banateanu, Tancred. 1977. Romania, din Tezaurul Portului Popular Traditional. Introduction by Mircea Malita. Bucuresti: Sport-Turism 5. Dancing, weddings, funerals followed an established practice and code for clothing marking gender and age. For example head decoration for women were extensively varied, even from one village to another in the same region, and these finely woven or embroidered head-pieces completed the rest of the costume. 6. For example, villagers of lower social status wore simple articles of costume and used simple ware for food consumption; whilst those of important status and wealth wore colorful and rich ornamented costumes of high quality fabric and used expensive and well-crafted ware. 7. Interestingly, the names of the varied dress elements, as those of the pottery utensils used traditionally have been lost once the artifacts ceased to be used (i.e. opregul, catrintele, fota, valnicul). 8. By dividing forms of domestic living, contemporary civilization has lost the link between decorative arts in interior and costumes. 9. For example, imported fabrics (cashmere, lace, wool) influenced the making of costumes; new glazes offered new chromatic combinations to local potters. For Siegfried Giedion, the form of the object-world articulated the social structure of the past. 10. Phillip Rawson - In de Waal, E. 2003. 20th Century Ceramics. London: Thames and Hudson. p.175 11. For example the Maiden’s Market (Gaina Mountain), an ancient pastoral festival (held every year on the 20th of July on the day of Saint Elijah). 12. As Nicolas Bourriaud says (ibid.), consumers become ‘tenants of culture’ Pp. 37",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "18",
language = "English",
volume = "n/a",
pages = "1--7",
booktitle = "Unknown Host Publication",

}

IONASCU, ADRIANA 2010, Urban Globalism versus Rural Artisans: Sustainable Practices of Making. in Unknown Host Publication. vol. n/a, pp. 1-7, Making Futures 2009, International Conference - The Crafts in the Context of Emerging Global Sustainability Agendas, 18/09/10.

Urban Globalism versus Rural Artisans: Sustainable Practices of Making. / IONASCU, ADRIANA.

Unknown Host Publication. Vol. n/a 2010. p. 1-7.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Urban Globalism versus Rural Artisans: Sustainable Practices of Making

AU - IONASCU, ADRIANA

N1 - Reference text: 1. As Grace-Lees Maffei said, the production of ‘home crafts’ is relevant in “engaging issues of public and private domesticities” 2. Like pottery or woodcarving, of woven or embroidered costumes 3. The leather, linen and wool obtained in the home were used for making domestic woven cloth. 4. Banateanu, Tancred. 1977. Romania, din Tezaurul Portului Popular Traditional. Introduction by Mircea Malita. Bucuresti: Sport-Turism 5. Dancing, weddings, funerals followed an established practice and code for clothing marking gender and age. For example head decoration for women were extensively varied, even from one village to another in the same region, and these finely woven or embroidered head-pieces completed the rest of the costume. 6. For example, villagers of lower social status wore simple articles of costume and used simple ware for food consumption; whilst those of important status and wealth wore colorful and rich ornamented costumes of high quality fabric and used expensive and well-crafted ware. 7. Interestingly, the names of the varied dress elements, as those of the pottery utensils used traditionally have been lost once the artifacts ceased to be used (i.e. opregul, catrintele, fota, valnicul). 8. By dividing forms of domestic living, contemporary civilization has lost the link between decorative arts in interior and costumes. 9. For example, imported fabrics (cashmere, lace, wool) influenced the making of costumes; new glazes offered new chromatic combinations to local potters. For Siegfried Giedion, the form of the object-world articulated the social structure of the past. 10. Phillip Rawson - In de Waal, E. 2003. 20th Century Ceramics. London: Thames and Hudson. p.175 11. For example the Maiden’s Market (Gaina Mountain), an ancient pastoral festival (held every year on the 20th of July on the day of Saint Elijah). 12. As Nicolas Bourriaud says (ibid.), consumers become ‘tenants of culture’ Pp. 37

PY - 2010/9/18

Y1 - 2010/9/18

N2 - This text discusses the regeneration and re-evaluation of the handmade and craft cultures as a means of sustaining the cultural heritage and identity of Moldavian, Transilvanian and Maramures artisan communities.The analysis looks at the revival of crafts and their role as sustainable methods of production in the Romanian counties. The focus is on craft production as a cooperative system of making, sustaining traditional ways of life (where home is self-sufficient model of production and consumption). It investigates the regeneration of the handmade culture as a means of sustaining the cultural heritage and identity of Romanian artisan communities; and the concept of the folk market as a potential mechanism for elevating the production and circulation of craft products in a ‘closed economy’.

AB - This text discusses the regeneration and re-evaluation of the handmade and craft cultures as a means of sustaining the cultural heritage and identity of Moldavian, Transilvanian and Maramures artisan communities.The analysis looks at the revival of crafts and their role as sustainable methods of production in the Romanian counties. The focus is on craft production as a cooperative system of making, sustaining traditional ways of life (where home is self-sufficient model of production and consumption). It investigates the regeneration of the handmade culture as a means of sustaining the cultural heritage and identity of Romanian artisan communities; and the concept of the folk market as a potential mechanism for elevating the production and circulation of craft products in a ‘closed economy’.

KW - hand-made culture

KW - folk market

KW - craft production

KW - 'closec-economy'

KW - self-sufficient production

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - n/a

SP - 1

EP - 7

BT - Unknown Host Publication

ER -