Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Understanding participants’ experiences of a behaviour change intervention within cardiac rehabilitation: A nested process evaluation within the STRENGTH randomised controlled trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: The STRENGTH (Self-management and Theory-based Rehabilitation Encouraging New Gateways to Healthy-Hearts) study evaluated a behaviour change intervention embedded within cardiac rehabilitation for individuals with coronary heart disease. This manuscript reports the process evaluation, which aimed to explore participants’ experiences of physical activity, barriers and facilitators to maintaining physical activity, and contextual and process-related factors influencing engagement with the intervention. Methods: A process evaluation was nested within a two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants from both intervention and control groups, focus groups were conducted with intervention participants. Thematic analysis examined factors influencing physical activity maintenance, including context, implementation, mechanisms of impact and perceived outcomes. Quantitative procedures measured intervention fidelity through attendance records and participant diaries. Results: Both groups highlighted environmental, social, and personal factors influencing participation in cardiac rehabilitation, such as social support, professional oversight, and structured programming. Trainers and peer interactions were valued for motivation and perceived safety. The intervention group reported additional facilitators, including tailored support, external accountability, and self-monitoring, which increased awareness and reinforced adherence. Mechanisms of impact included increased awareness of physical activity, greater exercise confidence, and a sense of accomplishment. A perceived lack of exercise confidence may have hindered independent physical activity engagement. Conclusions: While behaviour change strategies can enhance engagement in cardiac rehabilitation, their impact on measurable health outcomes remains unclear. Social support, professional oversight, and structured programming appear effective in maintaining physical activity levels, but future interventions should prioritise exercise confidence and education to promote sustained behaviour change. Trial registration: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on 26-01-2023 (ID: NCT05705310).
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0351117
Pages (from-to)1-16
Number of pages16
JournalPLoS One
Volume21
Issue number6
Early online date16 Jun 2026
DOIs
Publication statusPublished online - 16 Jun 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Doherty et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding

This study was supported by Heart Research United Kingdom: RG2686. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

FundersFunder number
Heart Research UKRG2686

    Keywords

    • Adherence Interventions
    • Aged
    • Behavior Therapy/methods
    • Cardiac Rehabilitation/methods
    • Coronary Disease/rehabilitation
    • Exercise
    • Female
    • Focus Groups
    • Health Behavior
    • Humans
    • Male
    • Middle Aged
    • Motivation
    • Social Support
    • Behavior Therapy
    • Cardiac Rehabilitation
    • Coronary Disease

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Understanding participants’ experiences of a behaviour change intervention within cardiac rehabilitation: A nested process evaluation within the STRENGTH randomised controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this