Tuning fork (128 Hz) versus Neurothesiometer: a comparison of methods of assessing vibration sensation in patients with diabetes mellitus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study compared the effectiveness of the graduated tuning fork (128 Hz) and the neurothesiometer in assessing vibration sensation perception in patients presenting with type II diabetes mellitus. A quota sample of patients (n = 21; age range 43-73 years) were assessed using the neurothesiometer and tuning fork by two investigators at five sites on both feet. There was a positive correlation between the results for the two methods of assessment for both investigators, and also between the results for both tools at three individual sites. Overall, there was 66.2% agreement between the results obtained from the two investigators using the tuning fork at each site; however, Kappa values only reached statistical significance at one site, indicating variability between the results from the two tools. This study suggests that assessment of vibration sensation with the tuning fork may be unreliable. These preliminary findings are based on a small sample size; thus further research is warranted.
LanguageEnglish
Pages174-178
JournalINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume60
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2006

Fingerprint

Vibration
Diabetes Mellitus
Research Personnel
Sample Size
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Foot
Research

Cite this

@article{bcc8d198baeb4429a8a6b805b0e7170f,
title = "Tuning fork (128 Hz) versus Neurothesiometer: a comparison of methods of assessing vibration sensation in patients with diabetes mellitus",
abstract = "The current study compared the effectiveness of the graduated tuning fork (128 Hz) and the neurothesiometer in assessing vibration sensation perception in patients presenting with type II diabetes mellitus. A quota sample of patients (n = 21; age range 43-73 years) were assessed using the neurothesiometer and tuning fork by two investigators at five sites on both feet. There was a positive correlation between the results for the two methods of assessment for both investigators, and also between the results for both tools at three individual sites. Overall, there was 66.2{\%} agreement between the results obtained from the two investigators using the tuning fork at each site; however, Kappa values only reached statistical significance at one site, indicating variability between the results from the two tools. This study suggests that assessment of vibration sensation with the tuning fork may be unreliable. These preliminary findings are based on a small sample size; thus further research is warranted.",
author = "J O'Neill and SM McCann and Katie Lagan",
year = "2006",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00650.x",
language = "English",
volume = "60",
pages = "174--178",
journal = "International Journal of Clinical Practice",
issn = "1368-5031",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Tuning fork (128 Hz) versus Neurothesiometer: a comparison of methods of assessing vibration sensation in patients with diabetes mellitus

AU - O'Neill, J

AU - McCann, SM

AU - Lagan, Katie

PY - 2006/2

Y1 - 2006/2

N2 - The current study compared the effectiveness of the graduated tuning fork (128 Hz) and the neurothesiometer in assessing vibration sensation perception in patients presenting with type II diabetes mellitus. A quota sample of patients (n = 21; age range 43-73 years) were assessed using the neurothesiometer and tuning fork by two investigators at five sites on both feet. There was a positive correlation between the results for the two methods of assessment for both investigators, and also between the results for both tools at three individual sites. Overall, there was 66.2% agreement between the results obtained from the two investigators using the tuning fork at each site; however, Kappa values only reached statistical significance at one site, indicating variability between the results from the two tools. This study suggests that assessment of vibration sensation with the tuning fork may be unreliable. These preliminary findings are based on a small sample size; thus further research is warranted.

AB - The current study compared the effectiveness of the graduated tuning fork (128 Hz) and the neurothesiometer in assessing vibration sensation perception in patients presenting with type II diabetes mellitus. A quota sample of patients (n = 21; age range 43-73 years) were assessed using the neurothesiometer and tuning fork by two investigators at five sites on both feet. There was a positive correlation between the results for the two methods of assessment for both investigators, and also between the results for both tools at three individual sites. Overall, there was 66.2% agreement between the results obtained from the two investigators using the tuning fork at each site; however, Kappa values only reached statistical significance at one site, indicating variability between the results from the two tools. This study suggests that assessment of vibration sensation with the tuning fork may be unreliable. These preliminary findings are based on a small sample size; thus further research is warranted.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00650.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2005.00650.x

M3 - Article

VL - 60

SP - 174

EP - 178

JO - International Journal of Clinical Practice

T2 - International Journal of Clinical Practice

JF - International Journal of Clinical Practice

SN - 1368-5031

IS - 2

ER -