Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the deliberations on cultural diversity and language policy that have occurred in Northern Ireland since the onset of the peace process. The paper looks specifically at how policy decisions and political debate on the Irish language and the languages of migrant communities are driven by competing notions of Britishness and Irishness, despite a supposed desire in the Belfast Agreement to promote ‘respect, understanding and tolerance in relation to linguistic diversity’. The paper argues that the peace process has increased the level of policy discussion on both autochthonous and allochthonous language issues, but has also served to cement their position within ethnic conflict. While debates on new policy directions have raised discussions on intercultural awareness in policy delivery, the competing interests of the political parties have tended to act as a barrier to the development of a true linguistic pluralism.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 245-266 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Ethnopolitics |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 30 Jun 2014 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- language policy
- Northern Ireland
- Irish Language
- immigration
- peace process
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Transitional Politics and Language Rights in a Multi-ethnic Northern Ireland: Towards a True Linguistic Pluralism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Philip McDermott
- School of Applied Social and Policy Sc. - Professor of Sociology
- Faculty of Arts, Humanities & Social Sciences - Full Professor
- Modern Languages and Linguistics Research
Person: Academic
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver