Abstract
Reconciliation and consociation were at the core of the Belfast/Good Friday Agreement (BGFA) in 1998. Analysis of the politics of the last 25 years in Northern Ireland (NI), however, reveals that many presumed aspects of reconciliation – integrated education, desegregated living, the disbandment of armed groups, cultural rapprochement, linguistic and cultural diversity, safe and secure shared public space, an approach to the past which puts the suffering of victims at its core – remain unaddressed or are deeply disputed. The article explores how consociational government in Northern Ireland has gradually decayed under pressure from this weakness. Since 2016, reconciliation has been a second-order consideration for the shaping partnership between the United Kingdom (U.K.) and Ireland which made the Agreement possible, leaving the Agreement at risk from the repeated exercise of the veto and dependent on the absence of any alternative, rather than proactive commitment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 45-61 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Treatises and Documents (Journal of Ethnic Studies) |
Volume | 90 |
Issue number | 90 |
Early online date | 30 Jun 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 30 Jun 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 Institute for Ethnic Studies. All rights reserved.
Keywords
- reconciliation
- Belfast/Good Friday Agreement
- consociation
- peacebuilding