Tracking the Debate Around Marine Protected Areas: Key Issuesand the BEG Framework

A Thorpe, JM Bavinck, Sarah Coulthard

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Abstract

    Marine conservation is often criticized for amono-disciplinary approach, which delivers fragmentedsolutions to complex problems with differing interpretationsof success. As a means of reflecting on the breadthand range of scientific research on the management of themarine environment, this paper develops an analyticalframework to gauge the foci of policy documents andpublished scientific work on Marine Protected Areas. Weevaluate the extent to which MPA research articles delineateobjectives around three domains: biological-ecological[B]; economic-social[E]; and governance-management[G]. This permits us to develop an analytic [BEG] frameworkwhich we then test on a sample of selected journalarticle cohorts. While the framework reveals the dominanceof biologically focussed research [B], analysis alsoreveals a growing frequency of the use of governance/management terminology in the literature over the last15 years, which may be indicative of a shift towards moreintegrated consideration of governance concerns. However,consideration of the economic/social domain appears to lagbehind biological and governance concerns in both frequencyand presence in MPA literature.
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages546-563
    JournalEnvironmental Management
    Volume47
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    Fingerprint

    governance
    management
    technical language
    economics
    conservation
    literature

    Cite this

    Thorpe, A ; Bavinck, JM ; Coulthard, Sarah. / Tracking the Debate Around Marine Protected Areas: Key Issuesand the BEG Framework. In: Environmental Management. 2011 ; Vol. 47. pp. 546-563.
    @article{ab2485cf94a2412b83b9cc5901206f44,
    title = "Tracking the Debate Around Marine Protected Areas: Key Issuesand the BEG Framework",
    abstract = "Marine conservation is often criticized for amono-disciplinary approach, which delivers fragmentedsolutions to complex problems with differing interpretationsof success. As a means of reflecting on the breadthand range of scientific research on the management of themarine environment, this paper develops an analyticalframework to gauge the foci of policy documents andpublished scientific work on Marine Protected Areas. Weevaluate the extent to which MPA research articles delineateobjectives around three domains: biological-ecological[B]; economic-social[E]; and governance-management[G]. This permits us to develop an analytic [BEG] frameworkwhich we then test on a sample of selected journalarticle cohorts. While the framework reveals the dominanceof biologically focussed research [B], analysis alsoreveals a growing frequency of the use of governance/management terminology in the literature over the last15 years, which may be indicative of a shift towards moreintegrated consideration of governance concerns. However,consideration of the economic/social domain appears to lagbehind biological and governance concerns in both frequencyand presence in MPA literature.",
    author = "A Thorpe and JM Bavinck and Sarah Coulthard",
    year = "2011",
    language = "English",
    volume = "47",
    pages = "546--563",
    journal = "Environmental Management",
    issn = "0364-152X",

    }

    Thorpe, A, Bavinck, JM & Coulthard, S 2011, 'Tracking the Debate Around Marine Protected Areas: Key Issuesand the BEG Framework', Environmental Management, vol. 47, pp. 546-563.

    Tracking the Debate Around Marine Protected Areas: Key Issuesand the BEG Framework. / Thorpe, A; Bavinck, JM; Coulthard, Sarah.

    In: Environmental Management, Vol. 47, 2011, p. 546-563.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Tracking the Debate Around Marine Protected Areas: Key Issuesand the BEG Framework

    AU - Thorpe, A

    AU - Bavinck, JM

    AU - Coulthard, Sarah

    PY - 2011

    Y1 - 2011

    N2 - Marine conservation is often criticized for amono-disciplinary approach, which delivers fragmentedsolutions to complex problems with differing interpretationsof success. As a means of reflecting on the breadthand range of scientific research on the management of themarine environment, this paper develops an analyticalframework to gauge the foci of policy documents andpublished scientific work on Marine Protected Areas. Weevaluate the extent to which MPA research articles delineateobjectives around three domains: biological-ecological[B]; economic-social[E]; and governance-management[G]. This permits us to develop an analytic [BEG] frameworkwhich we then test on a sample of selected journalarticle cohorts. While the framework reveals the dominanceof biologically focussed research [B], analysis alsoreveals a growing frequency of the use of governance/management terminology in the literature over the last15 years, which may be indicative of a shift towards moreintegrated consideration of governance concerns. However,consideration of the economic/social domain appears to lagbehind biological and governance concerns in both frequencyand presence in MPA literature.

    AB - Marine conservation is often criticized for amono-disciplinary approach, which delivers fragmentedsolutions to complex problems with differing interpretationsof success. As a means of reflecting on the breadthand range of scientific research on the management of themarine environment, this paper develops an analyticalframework to gauge the foci of policy documents andpublished scientific work on Marine Protected Areas. Weevaluate the extent to which MPA research articles delineateobjectives around three domains: biological-ecological[B]; economic-social[E]; and governance-management[G]. This permits us to develop an analytic [BEG] frameworkwhich we then test on a sample of selected journalarticle cohorts. While the framework reveals the dominanceof biologically focussed research [B], analysis alsoreveals a growing frequency of the use of governance/management terminology in the literature over the last15 years, which may be indicative of a shift towards moreintegrated consideration of governance concerns. However,consideration of the economic/social domain appears to lagbehind biological and governance concerns in both frequencyand presence in MPA literature.

    M3 - Article

    VL - 47

    SP - 546

    EP - 563

    JO - Environmental Management

    T2 - Environmental Management

    JF - Environmental Management

    SN - 0364-152X

    ER -