Towards establishing a higher acceptance rate for PEPTIDES - the peer review process and criteria for acceptance or rejection

JM Conlon, Karl-Heinz Herzig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The process of scientific publication is based on the principle of peer review which normally involves two or more referees. These reviewers certainly cannot be related to the authors nor should they have common publications within the last five years, although this can sometimes lead to difficulties because of a narrow field or multi-author papers. The referees should, of course, be experts with ample experience in the field and in publishing in peer-reviewed journals. The increase in the number of scientific journals and total publications has led to a clear shortage of these experts. Consequently, any journal needs a preliminary screening system in order to protect the time of our highly appreciated referees and the first task of the editors is to evaluate whether the manuscript has the potential to improve in the review process and be eventually published in the journal.
LanguageEnglish
Pages32
Number of pages33
JournalPeptides
Volume112
Publication statusPublished - 28 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Peer Review
Publications
Screening
Manuscripts
Rejection (Psychology)

Keywords

  • Peptides
  • Acceptance
  • Editorial
  • peer review

Cite this

@article{fb49020d5a2f46bcb425a8454f006ca5,
title = "Towards establishing a higher acceptance rate for PEPTIDES - the peer review process and criteria for acceptance or rejection",
abstract = "The process of scientific publication is based on the principle of peer review which normally involves two or more referees. These reviewers certainly cannot be related to the authors nor should they have common publications within the last five years, although this can sometimes lead to difficulties because of a narrow field or multi-author papers. The referees should, of course, be experts with ample experience in the field and in publishing in peer-reviewed journals. The increase in the number of scientific journals and total publications has led to a clear shortage of these experts. Consequently, any journal needs a preliminary screening system in order to protect the time of our highly appreciated referees and the first task of the editors is to evaluate whether the manuscript has the potential to improve in the review process and be eventually published in the journal.",
keywords = "Peptides, Acceptance, Editorial, peer review",
author = "JM Conlon and Karl-Heinz Herzig",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "28",
language = "English",
volume = "112",
pages = "32",
journal = "Peptides",
issn = "0196-9781",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Towards establishing a higher acceptance rate for PEPTIDES - the peer review process and criteria for acceptance or rejection. / Conlon, JM; Herzig , Karl-Heinz.

In: Peptides, Vol. 112, 28.11.2018, p. 32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards establishing a higher acceptance rate for PEPTIDES - the peer review process and criteria for acceptance or rejection

AU - Conlon, JM

AU - Herzig , Karl-Heinz

PY - 2018/11/28

Y1 - 2018/11/28

N2 - The process of scientific publication is based on the principle of peer review which normally involves two or more referees. These reviewers certainly cannot be related to the authors nor should they have common publications within the last five years, although this can sometimes lead to difficulties because of a narrow field or multi-author papers. The referees should, of course, be experts with ample experience in the field and in publishing in peer-reviewed journals. The increase in the number of scientific journals and total publications has led to a clear shortage of these experts. Consequently, any journal needs a preliminary screening system in order to protect the time of our highly appreciated referees and the first task of the editors is to evaluate whether the manuscript has the potential to improve in the review process and be eventually published in the journal.

AB - The process of scientific publication is based on the principle of peer review which normally involves two or more referees. These reviewers certainly cannot be related to the authors nor should they have common publications within the last five years, although this can sometimes lead to difficulties because of a narrow field or multi-author papers. The referees should, of course, be experts with ample experience in the field and in publishing in peer-reviewed journals. The increase in the number of scientific journals and total publications has led to a clear shortage of these experts. Consequently, any journal needs a preliminary screening system in order to protect the time of our highly appreciated referees and the first task of the editors is to evaluate whether the manuscript has the potential to improve in the review process and be eventually published in the journal.

KW - Peptides

KW - Acceptance

KW - Editorial

KW - peer review

M3 - Article

VL - 112

SP - 32

JO - Peptides

T2 - Peptides

JF - Peptides

SN - 0196-9781

ER -