Towards an index of linguistic justice

Michele Gazzola, Bengt-Arne Wickström, Mark Fettes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)


As a step towards a systematic comparative evaluation of the fairness of different language policies, a rationale is presented for the design of an index of linguistic justice based on public policy analysis. The approach taken is to define a ‘minimum threshold of linguistic justice’ with respect to government language policy in three domains: law and order, public administration, and essential services. A hypothetical situation of pure equality and freedom in the choice of language used by all members of society in communicating with the state is used as a theoretical benchmark to study the distributive effects of policy alternatives. Departures from this standard incur lower scores. Indicators are chosen to assess effective access to three kinds of language rights: toleration (the lack of state interference in private language choices), accommodation (accessibility of public services in different languages), and compensation (symbolic and practical recognition of languages outside the dominant one). In order to take account of the cost-benefit trade-offs involved in providing language-related goods to language groups of varying sizes, a method is adopted for weighting scores with respect to compensation rights so that lack of recognition for larger groups incurs greater penalties, while factoring in the particular characteristics of each language-related good. A trial set of ten indicators illustrates the compromises entailed in balancing theoretical rigour with empirical feasibility.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages28
JournalPolitics, Philosophy & Economics
Early online date17 Mar 2023
Publication statusPublished online - 17 Mar 2023


  • Linguistic Justice
  • language policy
  • public policy
  • Indicators
  • public goods
  • Language Rights


Dive into the research topics of 'Towards an index of linguistic justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this