TY - JOUR
T1 - Towards a microfluidic based rapid amylase assay system
AU - Holmes, RJ
AU - Summesgil, P
AU - Ryan, T
AU - Treve Brown, BJ
AU - Mockbil, A
AU - Grieve, BD
AU - Fielden, PR
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - This article describes work into a prototype system for the assay of amylase, using microfludic technologies. The new system has a significantly shorter cycle time than the current laboratory methods, which generally use microtitre plates, yet is capable of generating significantly superior results. As such, we have shown that sensitivity is enhanced by a factor of 10 in the standard assay trials, and by a factor of 2 in the real-sample lab trials. In both assays, the use of a microreactor system reduced the reaction time by a factor of 6.2, from 20 min incubation to 3.2 min. Basing the conclusion on the Megazyme Cerealpha Standard Method, and using the Cerealpha units as a measure of assay efficiency, the typical response for the microfluidic assay was shown to be 1.0 × 10−3 CU/mL (standard deviation [SD] 2.5 × 10−4 CU/mL), compared to 2.56 × 10−4 CU/mL (SD 5.94 × 10−5 CU/mL) for the standard macroassay. It is believed that this improvement in the reaction schematics is due to the inherent advantages of microfluidic devices such as superior mixing, higher thermal efficiency, and enhanced reaction kinetics.
AB - This article describes work into a prototype system for the assay of amylase, using microfludic technologies. The new system has a significantly shorter cycle time than the current laboratory methods, which generally use microtitre plates, yet is capable of generating significantly superior results. As such, we have shown that sensitivity is enhanced by a factor of 10 in the standard assay trials, and by a factor of 2 in the real-sample lab trials. In both assays, the use of a microreactor system reduced the reaction time by a factor of 6.2, from 20 min incubation to 3.2 min. Basing the conclusion on the Megazyme Cerealpha Standard Method, and using the Cerealpha units as a measure of assay efficiency, the typical response for the microfluidic assay was shown to be 1.0 × 10−3 CU/mL (standard deviation [SD] 2.5 × 10−4 CU/mL), compared to 2.56 × 10−4 CU/mL (SD 5.94 × 10−5 CU/mL) for the standard macroassay. It is believed that this improvement in the reaction schematics is due to the inherent advantages of microfluidic devices such as superior mixing, higher thermal efficiency, and enhanced reaction kinetics.
KW - amylase
KW - analysis
KW - enzyme assay
KW - instrumentation
KW - microfluidics
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/70350141286
U2 - 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01235.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01235.x
M3 - Article
SN - 1750-3841
VL - 74
SP - N37-N43
JO - Journal of Food Science
JF - Journal of Food Science
IS - 6
ER -