Time elapsed: untangling commemorative tragedies after conflict and tragedy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The time that elapses between a conflict or a traumatic event and its memorialisation can vary enormously depending on a range of social, economic and political circumstances. While the nuances of commemorative temporalities are not always amenable to ready synthesis due to the plethora of motivations involved in acts of remembrance, this paper marks an attempt to untangle some of the themes which have emerged from an analysis of the relationship between memorialisation and time. Conceptualising ‘time elapsed’ as a potentially important perspective in the study of memory and conflict, this paper has three intersecting objectives. First, it teases out some of the factors that may influence time elapsed; second, it questions whether the time it takes to memorialise traumatic events is lessening as society become more attuned to a ‘memorial vocabulary’; and finally, it determines the extent to which a ‘memory-boom’ is responsible for the recovery of tragedies seemingly forgotten.
LanguageEnglish
Pages185-200
JournalJournal of War and Culture Studies
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013

Fingerprint

event
memorial
social economics
vocabulary
time
Society

Cite this

@article{35c98aa1200f423195e35824290e8b81,
title = "Time elapsed: untangling commemorative tragedies after conflict and tragedy",
abstract = "The time that elapses between a conflict or a traumatic event and its memorialisation can vary enormously depending on a range of social, economic and political circumstances. While the nuances of commemorative temporalities are not always amenable to ready synthesis due to the plethora of motivations involved in acts of remembrance, this paper marks an attempt to untangle some of the themes which have emerged from an analysis of the relationship between memorialisation and time. Conceptualising ‘time elapsed’ as a potentially important perspective in the study of memory and conflict, this paper has three intersecting objectives. First, it teases out some of the factors that may influence time elapsed; second, it questions whether the time it takes to memorialise traumatic events is lessening as society become more attuned to a ‘memorial vocabulary’; and finally, it determines the extent to which a ‘memory-boom’ is responsible for the recovery of tragedies seemingly forgotten.",
author = "Sara McDowell",
year = "2013",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1179/1752627213Z.00000000017",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "185--200",
journal = "Journal of War and Culture Studies",
issn = "1752-6272",
number = "3",

}

Time elapsed: untangling commemorative tragedies after conflict and tragedy. / McDowell, Sara.

In: Journal of War and Culture Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3, 08.2013, p. 185-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Time elapsed: untangling commemorative tragedies after conflict and tragedy

AU - McDowell, Sara

PY - 2013/8

Y1 - 2013/8

N2 - The time that elapses between a conflict or a traumatic event and its memorialisation can vary enormously depending on a range of social, economic and political circumstances. While the nuances of commemorative temporalities are not always amenable to ready synthesis due to the plethora of motivations involved in acts of remembrance, this paper marks an attempt to untangle some of the themes which have emerged from an analysis of the relationship between memorialisation and time. Conceptualising ‘time elapsed’ as a potentially important perspective in the study of memory and conflict, this paper has three intersecting objectives. First, it teases out some of the factors that may influence time elapsed; second, it questions whether the time it takes to memorialise traumatic events is lessening as society become more attuned to a ‘memorial vocabulary’; and finally, it determines the extent to which a ‘memory-boom’ is responsible for the recovery of tragedies seemingly forgotten.

AB - The time that elapses between a conflict or a traumatic event and its memorialisation can vary enormously depending on a range of social, economic and political circumstances. While the nuances of commemorative temporalities are not always amenable to ready synthesis due to the plethora of motivations involved in acts of remembrance, this paper marks an attempt to untangle some of the themes which have emerged from an analysis of the relationship between memorialisation and time. Conceptualising ‘time elapsed’ as a potentially important perspective in the study of memory and conflict, this paper has three intersecting objectives. First, it teases out some of the factors that may influence time elapsed; second, it questions whether the time it takes to memorialise traumatic events is lessening as society become more attuned to a ‘memorial vocabulary’; and finally, it determines the extent to which a ‘memory-boom’ is responsible for the recovery of tragedies seemingly forgotten.

U2 - 10.1179/1752627213Z.00000000017

DO - 10.1179/1752627213Z.00000000017

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 185

EP - 200

JO - Journal of War and Culture Studies

T2 - Journal of War and Culture Studies

JF - Journal of War and Culture Studies

SN - 1752-6272

IS - 3

ER -