The Unique Position of National Human Rights Institutions: A Mixed Blessing?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

National Human Rights Institutions can play a key role in promoting and protecting human rights. They are able to do so by the unique position they occupy between government, civil society, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). However, this unique position which holds out opportunities for national human rights institutions also gives rise to problems for such institutions. National human rights institutions have to define and defend their role or space in relation to where they fit in with government and civil society. This can create difficulties for national human rights institutions with respect to their independence and accountability; two key concepts which are crucial for a national human rights institution’s legitimacy, credibility, and ultimately its effectiveness. This article explores these challengesand opportunities using examples from different countries. It further draws out a more subtle understanding of independence and accountability by conceptually unearthing the different layers within the two concepts. In conclusion, a number of recommendations are made as to how national human rights institutions can maintain their independence, while engaging with and being accountable to both government and civil society. The articleis supported in its conclusions by a series of semi-structured interviews with key institutional players in the national human rights institution world.
LanguageEnglish
Pages904-946
JournalHuman Rights Quarterly
Volume28
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2006

Fingerprint

human rights
civil society
responsibility
credibility
non-governmental organization
legitimacy
interview

Keywords

  • national human rights institutions
  • independence
  • accountability

Cite this

@article{e5e06829e5aa400c9c923e33d9183dbb,
title = "The Unique Position of National Human Rights Institutions: A Mixed Blessing?",
abstract = "National Human Rights Institutions can play a key role in promoting and protecting human rights. They are able to do so by the unique position they occupy between government, civil society, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). However, this unique position which holds out opportunities for national human rights institutions also gives rise to problems for such institutions. National human rights institutions have to define and defend their role or space in relation to where they fit in with government and civil society. This can create difficulties for national human rights institutions with respect to their independence and accountability; two key concepts which are crucial for a national human rights institution’s legitimacy, credibility, and ultimately its effectiveness. This article explores these challengesand opportunities using examples from different countries. It further draws out a more subtle understanding of independence and accountability by conceptually unearthing the different layers within the two concepts. In conclusion, a number of recommendations are made as to how national human rights institutions can maintain their independence, while engaging with and being accountable to both government and civil society. The articleis supported in its conclusions by a series of semi-structured interviews with key institutional players in the national human rights institution world.",
keywords = "national human rights institutions, independence, accountability",
author = "Anne Smith",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "904--946",
journal = "Human Rights Quarterly",
issn = "0275-0392",
number = "4",

}

The Unique Position of National Human Rights Institutions: A Mixed Blessing? / Smith, Anne.

In: Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 4, 01.11.2006, p. 904-946.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Unique Position of National Human Rights Institutions: A Mixed Blessing?

AU - Smith, Anne

PY - 2006/11/1

Y1 - 2006/11/1

N2 - National Human Rights Institutions can play a key role in promoting and protecting human rights. They are able to do so by the unique position they occupy between government, civil society, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). However, this unique position which holds out opportunities for national human rights institutions also gives rise to problems for such institutions. National human rights institutions have to define and defend their role or space in relation to where they fit in with government and civil society. This can create difficulties for national human rights institutions with respect to their independence and accountability; two key concepts which are crucial for a national human rights institution’s legitimacy, credibility, and ultimately its effectiveness. This article explores these challengesand opportunities using examples from different countries. It further draws out a more subtle understanding of independence and accountability by conceptually unearthing the different layers within the two concepts. In conclusion, a number of recommendations are made as to how national human rights institutions can maintain their independence, while engaging with and being accountable to both government and civil society. The articleis supported in its conclusions by a series of semi-structured interviews with key institutional players in the national human rights institution world.

AB - National Human Rights Institutions can play a key role in promoting and protecting human rights. They are able to do so by the unique position they occupy between government, civil society, and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). However, this unique position which holds out opportunities for national human rights institutions also gives rise to problems for such institutions. National human rights institutions have to define and defend their role or space in relation to where they fit in with government and civil society. This can create difficulties for national human rights institutions with respect to their independence and accountability; two key concepts which are crucial for a national human rights institution’s legitimacy, credibility, and ultimately its effectiveness. This article explores these challengesand opportunities using examples from different countries. It further draws out a more subtle understanding of independence and accountability by conceptually unearthing the different layers within the two concepts. In conclusion, a number of recommendations are made as to how national human rights institutions can maintain their independence, while engaging with and being accountable to both government and civil society. The articleis supported in its conclusions by a series of semi-structured interviews with key institutional players in the national human rights institution world.

KW - national human rights institutions

KW - independence

KW - accountability

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 904

EP - 946

JO - Human Rights Quarterly

T2 - Human Rights Quarterly

JF - Human Rights Quarterly

SN - 0275-0392

IS - 4

ER -