The trouble with accessing the countryside in Northern Ireland: a comparison with Great Britain

Linda Price, Mark Simpson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The 21st century has seen a shift in emphasis from enabling local authorities to provide opportunities for recreation on private land to the conferment of a general right to access certain types of land in Great Britain. Similar liberalisation has not occurred in Northern Ireland. This article examines features of the Northern Ireland context that might explain why landowners’ rights continue to trump those of recreational users, drawing on stakeholder interviews and a rural geography conceptual framework. Following historic struggles for land in Ireland, any erosion of owner control is perceived to undermine hard-won rights; in a relatively rural society and agrarian economy, farmers are readily accepted as having the ‘right’ to determine the function of rural land; and recent conflict has depressed outdoor leisure and tourism. Consequently, productive uses of land remain central to rural policy and a countryside movement able to overcome objections to liberalisation has not emerged. Conflict and instability have also left a legacy of social problems and ‘legislative lag’ in higher priority areas that must be addressed before countryside access can move up the political agenda. The paper reveals how, in stakeholders’ eyes, these factors combine to limit the prospects of reform.
LanguageEnglish
Pages183-200
JournalEnvironmental Law Review
Volume19
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

liberalization
stakeholder
political agenda
Social Problems
recreation
Ireland
erosion
farmer
Tourism
geography
reform
economy
interview
Society

Keywords

  • Environmental law
  • Access to the countryside
  • Right to roam
  • Devolution
  • Outdoor recreation
  • Access rights
  • National parks

Cite this

@article{6be8c89f4a30462c825c9def7ddf10a0,
title = "The trouble with accessing the countryside in Northern Ireland: a comparison with Great Britain",
abstract = "The 21st century has seen a shift in emphasis from enabling local authorities to provide opportunities for recreation on private land to the conferment of a general right to access certain types of land in Great Britain. Similar liberalisation has not occurred in Northern Ireland. This article examines features of the Northern Ireland context that might explain why landowners’ rights continue to trump those of recreational users, drawing on stakeholder interviews and a rural geography conceptual framework. Following historic struggles for land in Ireland, any erosion of owner control is perceived to undermine hard-won rights; in a relatively rural society and agrarian economy, farmers are readily accepted as having the ‘right’ to determine the function of rural land; and recent conflict has depressed outdoor leisure and tourism. Consequently, productive uses of land remain central to rural policy and a countryside movement able to overcome objections to liberalisation has not emerged. Conflict and instability have also left a legacy of social problems and ‘legislative lag’ in higher priority areas that must be addressed before countryside access can move up the political agenda. The paper reveals how, in stakeholders’ eyes, these factors combine to limit the prospects of reform.",
keywords = "Environmental law, Access to the countryside, Right to roam, Devolution, Outdoor recreation, Access rights, National parks",
author = "Linda Price and Mark Simpson",
note = "Compliant in UIR (see uploaded file '38597 evidence of compliance in UIR')",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1177/1461452917720632",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "183--200",
journal = "Environmental Law Review",
issn = "1461-4529",
number = "3",

}

The trouble with accessing the countryside in Northern Ireland: a comparison with Great Britain. / Price, Linda; Simpson, Mark.

In: Environmental Law Review, Vol. 19, No. 3, 06.09.2017, p. 183-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The trouble with accessing the countryside in Northern Ireland: a comparison with Great Britain

AU - Price, Linda

AU - Simpson, Mark

N1 - Compliant in UIR (see uploaded file '38597 evidence of compliance in UIR')

PY - 2017/9/6

Y1 - 2017/9/6

N2 - The 21st century has seen a shift in emphasis from enabling local authorities to provide opportunities for recreation on private land to the conferment of a general right to access certain types of land in Great Britain. Similar liberalisation has not occurred in Northern Ireland. This article examines features of the Northern Ireland context that might explain why landowners’ rights continue to trump those of recreational users, drawing on stakeholder interviews and a rural geography conceptual framework. Following historic struggles for land in Ireland, any erosion of owner control is perceived to undermine hard-won rights; in a relatively rural society and agrarian economy, farmers are readily accepted as having the ‘right’ to determine the function of rural land; and recent conflict has depressed outdoor leisure and tourism. Consequently, productive uses of land remain central to rural policy and a countryside movement able to overcome objections to liberalisation has not emerged. Conflict and instability have also left a legacy of social problems and ‘legislative lag’ in higher priority areas that must be addressed before countryside access can move up the political agenda. The paper reveals how, in stakeholders’ eyes, these factors combine to limit the prospects of reform.

AB - The 21st century has seen a shift in emphasis from enabling local authorities to provide opportunities for recreation on private land to the conferment of a general right to access certain types of land in Great Britain. Similar liberalisation has not occurred in Northern Ireland. This article examines features of the Northern Ireland context that might explain why landowners’ rights continue to trump those of recreational users, drawing on stakeholder interviews and a rural geography conceptual framework. Following historic struggles for land in Ireland, any erosion of owner control is perceived to undermine hard-won rights; in a relatively rural society and agrarian economy, farmers are readily accepted as having the ‘right’ to determine the function of rural land; and recent conflict has depressed outdoor leisure and tourism. Consequently, productive uses of land remain central to rural policy and a countryside movement able to overcome objections to liberalisation has not emerged. Conflict and instability have also left a legacy of social problems and ‘legislative lag’ in higher priority areas that must be addressed before countryside access can move up the political agenda. The paper reveals how, in stakeholders’ eyes, these factors combine to limit the prospects of reform.

KW - Environmental law

KW - Access to the countryside

KW - Right to roam

KW - Devolution

KW - Outdoor recreation

KW - Access rights

KW - National parks

U2 - 10.1177/1461452917720632

DO - 10.1177/1461452917720632

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 183

EP - 200

JO - Environmental Law Review

T2 - Environmental Law Review

JF - Environmental Law Review

SN - 1461-4529

IS - 3

ER -