The Time and Space of Transitional Justice

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The early transitional justice scholarship was premised on the notion that a window of opportunity was created by the transition itself, allowing nascent democracies to devise justice tools in order to remedy victims and to consolidate the new democratic order. Grounded in a merger of human rights advocacy and the ‘transition to democracy’ literature of the 1980s and 1990s, transitional justice scholars focused on how newly established democratic governments could use the ‘transitional moment’ to respond to the abuses committed by their repressive predecessors. In so doing, it was assumed that the transition presented both opportunities and limitations to the kind of justice that could be rendered. Since then, however, transitional justice scholarship has developed enormously. Notably, contemporary studies of transitional justice interrogate justice processes aimed at addressing human rights abuses and more broadly the roots of conflict in a myriad of situations not characterized by a liberalizing political transition and the State has come to be seen as only one among several relevant actors relevant for promoting and implementing transitional justice tools. This chapter argues that the move away from viewing transitional justice primarily as the responses of a new democratic regime to abuses committed by a past undemocratic and repressive regime raises profound questions for the understanding of what transitional justice is and what it can achieve, which have not been sufficiently explored in the scholarship. First, the chapter discusses the implications of transitional justice no longer necessarily being confined to a limited ‘window of opportunity’ in time. Second, the chapter discusses the ramifications of transitional justice no longer being reserved for periods of liberalizing political transition. Finally, the chapter examines the consequences of transitional justice occurring at other levels than the State level.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch Handbook on Transitional Justice
EditorsCheryl Lawther, Luke Moffett, Dov Jacobs
Place of PublicationUK
Pages34-51
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

justice
abuse
time
human rights
regime
democracy
merger
remedies

Keywords

  • Transitional Justice
  • theory of
  • political transitions

Cite this

Hansen, T. O. (2017). The Time and Space of Transitional Justice. In C. Lawther, L. Moffett, & D. Jacobs (Eds.), Research Handbook on Transitional Justice (pp. 34-51). UK.
Hansen, Thomas Obel. / The Time and Space of Transitional Justice. Research Handbook on Transitional Justice. editor / Cheryl Lawther ; Luke Moffett ; Dov Jacobs. UK, 2017. pp. 34-51
@inbook{9cc6c1fb8554473f93332ed4b663935e,
title = "The Time and Space of Transitional Justice",
abstract = "The early transitional justice scholarship was premised on the notion that a window of opportunity was created by the transition itself, allowing nascent democracies to devise justice tools in order to remedy victims and to consolidate the new democratic order. Grounded in a merger of human rights advocacy and the ‘transition to democracy’ literature of the 1980s and 1990s, transitional justice scholars focused on how newly established democratic governments could use the ‘transitional moment’ to respond to the abuses committed by their repressive predecessors. In so doing, it was assumed that the transition presented both opportunities and limitations to the kind of justice that could be rendered. Since then, however, transitional justice scholarship has developed enormously. Notably, contemporary studies of transitional justice interrogate justice processes aimed at addressing human rights abuses and more broadly the roots of conflict in a myriad of situations not characterized by a liberalizing political transition and the State has come to be seen as only one among several relevant actors relevant for promoting and implementing transitional justice tools. This chapter argues that the move away from viewing transitional justice primarily as the responses of a new democratic regime to abuses committed by a past undemocratic and repressive regime raises profound questions for the understanding of what transitional justice is and what it can achieve, which have not been sufficiently explored in the scholarship. First, the chapter discusses the implications of transitional justice no longer necessarily being confined to a limited ‘window of opportunity’ in time. Second, the chapter discusses the ramifications of transitional justice no longer being reserved for periods of liberalizing political transition. Finally, the chapter examines the consequences of transitional justice occurring at other levels than the State level.",
keywords = "Transitional Justice, theory of, political transitions",
author = "Hansen, {Thomas Obel}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
language = "English",
isbn = "978 1 78195 531 4",
pages = "34--51",
editor = "Cheryl Lawther and Luke Moffett and Dov Jacobs",
booktitle = "Research Handbook on Transitional Justice",

}

Hansen, TO 2017, The Time and Space of Transitional Justice. in C Lawther, L Moffett & D Jacobs (eds), Research Handbook on Transitional Justice. UK, pp. 34-51.

The Time and Space of Transitional Justice. / Hansen, Thomas Obel.

Research Handbook on Transitional Justice. ed. / Cheryl Lawther; Luke Moffett; Dov Jacobs. UK, 2017. p. 34-51.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Time and Space of Transitional Justice

AU - Hansen, Thomas Obel

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - The early transitional justice scholarship was premised on the notion that a window of opportunity was created by the transition itself, allowing nascent democracies to devise justice tools in order to remedy victims and to consolidate the new democratic order. Grounded in a merger of human rights advocacy and the ‘transition to democracy’ literature of the 1980s and 1990s, transitional justice scholars focused on how newly established democratic governments could use the ‘transitional moment’ to respond to the abuses committed by their repressive predecessors. In so doing, it was assumed that the transition presented both opportunities and limitations to the kind of justice that could be rendered. Since then, however, transitional justice scholarship has developed enormously. Notably, contemporary studies of transitional justice interrogate justice processes aimed at addressing human rights abuses and more broadly the roots of conflict in a myriad of situations not characterized by a liberalizing political transition and the State has come to be seen as only one among several relevant actors relevant for promoting and implementing transitional justice tools. This chapter argues that the move away from viewing transitional justice primarily as the responses of a new democratic regime to abuses committed by a past undemocratic and repressive regime raises profound questions for the understanding of what transitional justice is and what it can achieve, which have not been sufficiently explored in the scholarship. First, the chapter discusses the implications of transitional justice no longer necessarily being confined to a limited ‘window of opportunity’ in time. Second, the chapter discusses the ramifications of transitional justice no longer being reserved for periods of liberalizing political transition. Finally, the chapter examines the consequences of transitional justice occurring at other levels than the State level.

AB - The early transitional justice scholarship was premised on the notion that a window of opportunity was created by the transition itself, allowing nascent democracies to devise justice tools in order to remedy victims and to consolidate the new democratic order. Grounded in a merger of human rights advocacy and the ‘transition to democracy’ literature of the 1980s and 1990s, transitional justice scholars focused on how newly established democratic governments could use the ‘transitional moment’ to respond to the abuses committed by their repressive predecessors. In so doing, it was assumed that the transition presented both opportunities and limitations to the kind of justice that could be rendered. Since then, however, transitional justice scholarship has developed enormously. Notably, contemporary studies of transitional justice interrogate justice processes aimed at addressing human rights abuses and more broadly the roots of conflict in a myriad of situations not characterized by a liberalizing political transition and the State has come to be seen as only one among several relevant actors relevant for promoting and implementing transitional justice tools. This chapter argues that the move away from viewing transitional justice primarily as the responses of a new democratic regime to abuses committed by a past undemocratic and repressive regime raises profound questions for the understanding of what transitional justice is and what it can achieve, which have not been sufficiently explored in the scholarship. First, the chapter discusses the implications of transitional justice no longer necessarily being confined to a limited ‘window of opportunity’ in time. Second, the chapter discusses the ramifications of transitional justice no longer being reserved for periods of liberalizing political transition. Finally, the chapter examines the consequences of transitional justice occurring at other levels than the State level.

KW - Transitional Justice

KW - theory of

KW - political transitions

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978 1 78195 531 4

SP - 34

EP - 51

BT - Research Handbook on Transitional Justice

A2 - Lawther, Cheryl

A2 - Moffett, Luke

A2 - Jacobs, Dov

CY - UK

ER -

Hansen TO. The Time and Space of Transitional Justice. In Lawther C, Moffett L, Jacobs D, editors, Research Handbook on Transitional Justice. UK. 2017. p. 34-51