The status of passive constructions in Old English

Howard Jones, Morgan Macleod

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Old English, passive-type constructions involving a copula and a passive participle could be used to express both events and states. Two different types of copula are found in these constructions: weorðan, meaning ‘become’ and wesan and beon, meaning ‘be’. There has been some dispute as to how the meaning of these copulas relates to the meaning of the construction as a whole, in both its eventive and its stative uses, and whether any of these constructions was grammaticalized in the sense that their meaning was non-compositional. We propose a semantic model that represents these constructions compositionally and test it against a selected corpus of Old English texts in order to address two questions: whether the data provide evidence of non-compositional meaning that would suggest grammaticalization, and whether other factors are also responsible for the choice of copula. Our analysis suggests that the attested Old English passives are fully compatible with a compositional analysis; we also discuss additional semantic factors that may be responsible for the lower frequency of passives with weorðan.
LanguageEnglish
Pages59-90
Number of pages32
JournalTransactions of the Philological Society
Volume116
Issue number1
Early online date20 Apr 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2018

Fingerprint

Old English
Copula
Old English Texts
Stative
Grammaticalization
Passive Participle
Dispute
Compositional Analysis

Cite this

@article{d835676b32464bcf9c885e484fdd7ef9,
title = "The status of passive constructions in Old English",
abstract = "In Old English, passive-type constructions involving a copula and a passive participle could be used to express both events and states. Two different types of copula are found in these constructions: weor{\dh}an, meaning ‘become’ and wesan and beon, meaning ‘be’. There has been some dispute as to how the meaning of these copulas relates to the meaning of the construction as a whole, in both its eventive and its stative uses, and whether any of these constructions was grammaticalized in the sense that their meaning was non-compositional. We propose a semantic model that represents these constructions compositionally and test it against a selected corpus of Old English texts in order to address two questions: whether the data provide evidence of non-compositional meaning that would suggest grammaticalization, and whether other factors are also responsible for the choice of copula. Our analysis suggests that the attested Old English passives are fully compatible with a compositional analysis; we also discuss additional semantic factors that may be responsible for the lower frequency of passives with weor{\dh}an.",
author = "Howard Jones and Morgan Macleod",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1111/1467-968X.12101",
language = "English",
volume = "116",
pages = "59--90",
journal = "Transactions of the Philological Society",
issn = "0079-1636",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "1",

}

The status of passive constructions in Old English. / Jones, Howard; Macleod, Morgan.

In: Transactions of the Philological Society, Vol. 116, No. 1, 30.03.2018, p. 59-90.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The status of passive constructions in Old English

AU - Jones, Howard

AU - Macleod, Morgan

PY - 2018/3/30

Y1 - 2018/3/30

N2 - In Old English, passive-type constructions involving a copula and a passive participle could be used to express both events and states. Two different types of copula are found in these constructions: weorðan, meaning ‘become’ and wesan and beon, meaning ‘be’. There has been some dispute as to how the meaning of these copulas relates to the meaning of the construction as a whole, in both its eventive and its stative uses, and whether any of these constructions was grammaticalized in the sense that their meaning was non-compositional. We propose a semantic model that represents these constructions compositionally and test it against a selected corpus of Old English texts in order to address two questions: whether the data provide evidence of non-compositional meaning that would suggest grammaticalization, and whether other factors are also responsible for the choice of copula. Our analysis suggests that the attested Old English passives are fully compatible with a compositional analysis; we also discuss additional semantic factors that may be responsible for the lower frequency of passives with weorðan.

AB - In Old English, passive-type constructions involving a copula and a passive participle could be used to express both events and states. Two different types of copula are found in these constructions: weorðan, meaning ‘become’ and wesan and beon, meaning ‘be’. There has been some dispute as to how the meaning of these copulas relates to the meaning of the construction as a whole, in both its eventive and its stative uses, and whether any of these constructions was grammaticalized in the sense that their meaning was non-compositional. We propose a semantic model that represents these constructions compositionally and test it against a selected corpus of Old English texts in order to address two questions: whether the data provide evidence of non-compositional meaning that would suggest grammaticalization, and whether other factors are also responsible for the choice of copula. Our analysis suggests that the attested Old English passives are fully compatible with a compositional analysis; we also discuss additional semantic factors that may be responsible for the lower frequency of passives with weorðan.

U2 - 10.1111/1467-968X.12101

DO - 10.1111/1467-968X.12101

M3 - Article

VL - 116

SP - 59

EP - 90

JO - Transactions of the Philological Society

T2 - Transactions of the Philological Society

JF - Transactions of the Philological Society

SN - 0079-1636

IS - 1

ER -