The social union after the coalition: devolution, divergence and convergence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2009, the UK government emphasised that it was ‘deeply committed’ to the maintenance of the state's social union, embodied in a single social security system. Five years later, the future of this social union appeared less certain than at any time since the 1920s. Dissatisfaction with the ‘welfare reform’ agenda of the coalition government was a driver of support for Scottish independence in the 2014 referendum campaign. Meanwhile, the Northern Ireland Assembly failed to pass legislation to mirror the Welfare Reform Act 2012, normally a formality due to the convention of parity in social security. Despite Westminster's subsequent extension of the 2012 reforms to the region, divergence in secondary legislation and practice remains likely. This article draws on the findings of qualitative interviews with politicians and civil servants in both regions during a period covering the conclusion of the Smith Commission's work on the future of Scottish devolution and the height of a political impasse over Northern Ireland's Welfare Reform Bill that threatened a constitutional crisis. It considers the extent to which steps towards divergence in the two devolved regions have altered the UK's social union and to which the two processes have influenced one another
LanguageEnglish
Pages251-268
JournalJournal of Social Policy
Volume46
Issue number2
Early online date22 Jul 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

social union
welfare reform
devolution
divergence
decentralization
coalition
social security
reform
welfare
legislation
referendum
civil servant
qualitative interview
bill
politician
campaign
driver
act

Keywords

  • Devolution
  • Welfare reform
  • Social citizenship
  • Welfare nationalism
  • Scottish referendum
  • Northern Ireland

Cite this

@article{0dfbffed1ce04cc7a8b1fac152cc3cb9,
title = "The social union after the coalition: devolution, divergence and convergence",
abstract = "In 2009, the UK government emphasised that it was ‘deeply committed’ to the maintenance of the state's social union, embodied in a single social security system. Five years later, the future of this social union appeared less certain than at any time since the 1920s. Dissatisfaction with the ‘welfare reform’ agenda of the coalition government was a driver of support for Scottish independence in the 2014 referendum campaign. Meanwhile, the Northern Ireland Assembly failed to pass legislation to mirror the Welfare Reform Act 2012, normally a formality due to the convention of parity in social security. Despite Westminster's subsequent extension of the 2012 reforms to the region, divergence in secondary legislation and practice remains likely. This article draws on the findings of qualitative interviews with politicians and civil servants in both regions during a period covering the conclusion of the Smith Commission's work on the future of Scottish devolution and the height of a political impasse over Northern Ireland's Welfare Reform Bill that threatened a constitutional crisis. It considers the extent to which steps towards divergence in the two devolved regions have altered the UK's social union and to which the two processes have influenced one another",
keywords = "Devolution, Welfare reform, Social citizenship, Welfare nationalism, Scottish referendum, Northern Ireland",
author = "Mark Simpson",
note = "Compliant in UIR (see uploaded file '37609 Evidence of compliance in UIR')",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1017/S0047279416000568",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "251--268",
journal = "Journal of Social Policy",
issn = "0047-2794",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "2",

}

The social union after the coalition: devolution, divergence and convergence. / Simpson, Mark.

In: Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 46, No. 2, 30.04.2017, p. 251-268.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The social union after the coalition: devolution, divergence and convergence

AU - Simpson, Mark

N1 - Compliant in UIR (see uploaded file '37609 Evidence of compliance in UIR')

PY - 2017/4/30

Y1 - 2017/4/30

N2 - In 2009, the UK government emphasised that it was ‘deeply committed’ to the maintenance of the state's social union, embodied in a single social security system. Five years later, the future of this social union appeared less certain than at any time since the 1920s. Dissatisfaction with the ‘welfare reform’ agenda of the coalition government was a driver of support for Scottish independence in the 2014 referendum campaign. Meanwhile, the Northern Ireland Assembly failed to pass legislation to mirror the Welfare Reform Act 2012, normally a formality due to the convention of parity in social security. Despite Westminster's subsequent extension of the 2012 reforms to the region, divergence in secondary legislation and practice remains likely. This article draws on the findings of qualitative interviews with politicians and civil servants in both regions during a period covering the conclusion of the Smith Commission's work on the future of Scottish devolution and the height of a political impasse over Northern Ireland's Welfare Reform Bill that threatened a constitutional crisis. It considers the extent to which steps towards divergence in the two devolved regions have altered the UK's social union and to which the two processes have influenced one another

AB - In 2009, the UK government emphasised that it was ‘deeply committed’ to the maintenance of the state's social union, embodied in a single social security system. Five years later, the future of this social union appeared less certain than at any time since the 1920s. Dissatisfaction with the ‘welfare reform’ agenda of the coalition government was a driver of support for Scottish independence in the 2014 referendum campaign. Meanwhile, the Northern Ireland Assembly failed to pass legislation to mirror the Welfare Reform Act 2012, normally a formality due to the convention of parity in social security. Despite Westminster's subsequent extension of the 2012 reforms to the region, divergence in secondary legislation and practice remains likely. This article draws on the findings of qualitative interviews with politicians and civil servants in both regions during a period covering the conclusion of the Smith Commission's work on the future of Scottish devolution and the height of a political impasse over Northern Ireland's Welfare Reform Bill that threatened a constitutional crisis. It considers the extent to which steps towards divergence in the two devolved regions have altered the UK's social union and to which the two processes have influenced one another

KW - Devolution

KW - Welfare reform

KW - Social citizenship

KW - Welfare nationalism

KW - Scottish referendum

KW - Northern Ireland

U2 - 10.1017/S0047279416000568

DO - 10.1017/S0047279416000568

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 251

EP - 268

JO - Journal of Social Policy

T2 - Journal of Social Policy

JF - Journal of Social Policy

SN - 0047-2794

IS - 2

ER -