The role of geographical distance and its efficacy on global purchasing practices

Frank Wiengarten, Ambrose Eamon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the extent to which the geographical location of and thus the geographical distance between buyer and supplier impact on the efficacy of purchasing practices (i.e. strategic purchasing management, tactical purchasing management, relational purchasing management) in terms of operational performance.Design/methodology/approach The authors utilise cross-country data collected through the International Purchasing Survey group across a variety of countries and industry sectors. The authors conduct exploratory factor analysis to assess construct validity and regression analysis to test the varying effects of purchasing practices on operational performance. The authors split the sample to compare potential differences in the efficacy of purchasing practices between buyers and suppliers through geographical characteristics. Findings The results indicate that the efficacy of purchasing practices does indeed vary depending on differences in geographical location. Specifically, the authors identify that in cases where the buyer and supplier are located in the same country tactical and relational purchasing tools have a positive impact on operational performance. However, in cases where they are situated in different countries none of the purchasing tools seems to significantly improve operational performance. Originality/value Research that has taken a cross-country perspective on the efficacy of supply chain practices is surprisingly sparse. Since most supply chains are becoming more and more global it is important to consider the geographical location of the supply chain members when assessing the performance benefits of supply chain practices such as purchasing tools. Thus, the authors introduce and test the concept of geographical distance on the efficacy of purchasing practices at the dyadic level. To test the implications of geographical distance for purchasing practices the authors use a large-scale cross-country survey.
LanguageEnglish
Pages865-881
JournalInternational Journal of Operations & Production Management
Volume37
Issue number7
Early online date3 Jul 2017
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 3 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Purchasing
Supply chains
Efficacy
Factor analysis
Regression analysis

Keywords

  • Survey
  • Operational performance
  • Location
  • Geographical distance
  • Purchasing practices

Cite this

@article{4f9fad1f6a8349bba2fd00ef1271c3c4,
title = "The role of geographical distance and its efficacy on global purchasing practices",
abstract = "Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the extent to which the geographical location of and thus the geographical distance between buyer and supplier impact on the efficacy of purchasing practices (i.e. strategic purchasing management, tactical purchasing management, relational purchasing management) in terms of operational performance.Design/methodology/approach The authors utilise cross-country data collected through the International Purchasing Survey group across a variety of countries and industry sectors. The authors conduct exploratory factor analysis to assess construct validity and regression analysis to test the varying effects of purchasing practices on operational performance. The authors split the sample to compare potential differences in the efficacy of purchasing practices between buyers and suppliers through geographical characteristics. Findings The results indicate that the efficacy of purchasing practices does indeed vary depending on differences in geographical location. Specifically, the authors identify that in cases where the buyer and supplier are located in the same country tactical and relational purchasing tools have a positive impact on operational performance. However, in cases where they are situated in different countries none of the purchasing tools seems to significantly improve operational performance. Originality/value Research that has taken a cross-country perspective on the efficacy of supply chain practices is surprisingly sparse. Since most supply chains are becoming more and more global it is important to consider the geographical location of the supply chain members when assessing the performance benefits of supply chain practices such as purchasing tools. Thus, the authors introduce and test the concept of geographical distance on the efficacy of purchasing practices at the dyadic level. To test the implications of geographical distance for purchasing practices the authors use a large-scale cross-country survey.",
keywords = "Survey, Operational performance, Location, Geographical distance, Purchasing practices",
author = "Frank Wiengarten and Ambrose Eamon",
note = "Compliant in UIR; evidence uploaded to 'Other files'. However, it shows as having a 24-mth embargo, but Sherpa REF now states no embargo.",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1108/IJOPM-09-2015-0556",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "865--881",
journal = "International Journal of Operations and Production Management",
issn = "0144-3577",
number = "7",

}

The role of geographical distance and its efficacy on global purchasing practices. / Wiengarten, Frank; Eamon, Ambrose.

In: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 37, No. 7, 03.07.2017, p. 865-881.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of geographical distance and its efficacy on global purchasing practices

AU - Wiengarten, Frank

AU - Eamon, Ambrose

N1 - Compliant in UIR; evidence uploaded to 'Other files'. However, it shows as having a 24-mth embargo, but Sherpa REF now states no embargo.

PY - 2017/7/3

Y1 - 2017/7/3

N2 - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the extent to which the geographical location of and thus the geographical distance between buyer and supplier impact on the efficacy of purchasing practices (i.e. strategic purchasing management, tactical purchasing management, relational purchasing management) in terms of operational performance.Design/methodology/approach The authors utilise cross-country data collected through the International Purchasing Survey group across a variety of countries and industry sectors. The authors conduct exploratory factor analysis to assess construct validity and regression analysis to test the varying effects of purchasing practices on operational performance. The authors split the sample to compare potential differences in the efficacy of purchasing practices between buyers and suppliers through geographical characteristics. Findings The results indicate that the efficacy of purchasing practices does indeed vary depending on differences in geographical location. Specifically, the authors identify that in cases where the buyer and supplier are located in the same country tactical and relational purchasing tools have a positive impact on operational performance. However, in cases where they are situated in different countries none of the purchasing tools seems to significantly improve operational performance. Originality/value Research that has taken a cross-country perspective on the efficacy of supply chain practices is surprisingly sparse. Since most supply chains are becoming more and more global it is important to consider the geographical location of the supply chain members when assessing the performance benefits of supply chain practices such as purchasing tools. Thus, the authors introduce and test the concept of geographical distance on the efficacy of purchasing practices at the dyadic level. To test the implications of geographical distance for purchasing practices the authors use a large-scale cross-country survey.

AB - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the extent to which the geographical location of and thus the geographical distance between buyer and supplier impact on the efficacy of purchasing practices (i.e. strategic purchasing management, tactical purchasing management, relational purchasing management) in terms of operational performance.Design/methodology/approach The authors utilise cross-country data collected through the International Purchasing Survey group across a variety of countries and industry sectors. The authors conduct exploratory factor analysis to assess construct validity and regression analysis to test the varying effects of purchasing practices on operational performance. The authors split the sample to compare potential differences in the efficacy of purchasing practices between buyers and suppliers through geographical characteristics. Findings The results indicate that the efficacy of purchasing practices does indeed vary depending on differences in geographical location. Specifically, the authors identify that in cases where the buyer and supplier are located in the same country tactical and relational purchasing tools have a positive impact on operational performance. However, in cases where they are situated in different countries none of the purchasing tools seems to significantly improve operational performance. Originality/value Research that has taken a cross-country perspective on the efficacy of supply chain practices is surprisingly sparse. Since most supply chains are becoming more and more global it is important to consider the geographical location of the supply chain members when assessing the performance benefits of supply chain practices such as purchasing tools. Thus, the authors introduce and test the concept of geographical distance on the efficacy of purchasing practices at the dyadic level. To test the implications of geographical distance for purchasing practices the authors use a large-scale cross-country survey.

KW - Survey

KW - Operational performance

KW - Location

KW - Geographical distance

KW - Purchasing practices

U2 - 10.1108/IJOPM-09-2015-0556

DO - 10.1108/IJOPM-09-2015-0556

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 865

EP - 881

JO - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

T2 - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

JF - International Journal of Operations and Production Management

SN - 0144-3577

IS - 7

ER -