The risk free rate of return in UK property pricing

Norman Hutchison, Patricia Fraser, Alastair Adair, Srivatsa Rahul

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - The aim of this paper is to consider the appropriate benchmark risk free rate sui for pricing of property investments in the UK and, in doing so, investigate the financial characteristics and performance of the UK gilt yields. European investors have been significant players in the UK commercial property market during the last decade and in order to be competitive in bidding situations with UK-based investors, require to be aware of the pricing criteria adopted. Design/methodology/approach - This paper analyses the stability, yield distribution and volatility of both conventional gilts and index-linked gilts with different maturities over the period 1980-2010. It considers the changing structure of the UK commercial property market and reports on a questionnaire survey of the UK property investment community, which focused on the rationale behind the selection of the appropriate risk free rate of return. Findings - The analysis suggests that ten-year index-linked gilts have been the most stable, but that if conventional gilts are preferred, then five-year nominal appear to be more stable than ten-year nominal; ten-year real yields are smoother and relatively less volatile. In the authors' survey of the UK property investment fund managers and their advisors, the majority, but by no means all of the respondents, used the ten-year nominal gilt yield as their risk free rate of return. However, questions were raised as to whether it was appropriate to use spot or average gilt yields, particularly when rates in 2009/2010 had fallen to such low level. Originality/value - The findings provide a better understanding of how the different maturities of gilts behave. Insight is given on the criteria adopted by investors when selecting the risk free rate.
LanguageEnglish
Pages165-184
JournalJournal of European Real Estate Research
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Nov 2011

Fingerprint

Pricing
Risk-free rate
Rate of return
Investors
Property investment
Maturity
Property market
Benchmark
Design methodology
Investment funds
Advisors
Questionnaire survey
Rationale
Bidding
Fund managers
Yield distributions

Cite this

Hutchison, Norman ; Fraser, Patricia ; Adair, Alastair ; Rahul, Srivatsa. / The risk free rate of return in UK property pricing. In: Journal of European Real Estate Research. 2011 ; Vol. 4, No. 3. pp. 165-184.
@article{3f37b6621bb24af9ab15199a13be9c36,
title = "The risk free rate of return in UK property pricing",
abstract = "Purpose - The aim of this paper is to consider the appropriate benchmark risk free rate sui for pricing of property investments in the UK and, in doing so, investigate the financial characteristics and performance of the UK gilt yields. European investors have been significant players in the UK commercial property market during the last decade and in order to be competitive in bidding situations with UK-based investors, require to be aware of the pricing criteria adopted. Design/methodology/approach - This paper analyses the stability, yield distribution and volatility of both conventional gilts and index-linked gilts with different maturities over the period 1980-2010. It considers the changing structure of the UK commercial property market and reports on a questionnaire survey of the UK property investment community, which focused on the rationale behind the selection of the appropriate risk free rate of return. Findings - The analysis suggests that ten-year index-linked gilts have been the most stable, but that if conventional gilts are preferred, then five-year nominal appear to be more stable than ten-year nominal; ten-year real yields are smoother and relatively less volatile. In the authors' survey of the UK property investment fund managers and their advisors, the majority, but by no means all of the respondents, used the ten-year nominal gilt yield as their risk free rate of return. However, questions were raised as to whether it was appropriate to use spot or average gilt yields, particularly when rates in 2009/2010 had fallen to such low level. Originality/value - The findings provide a better understanding of how the different maturities of gilts behave. Insight is given on the criteria adopted by investors when selecting the risk free rate.",
author = "Norman Hutchison and Patricia Fraser and Alastair Adair and Srivatsa Rahul",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1108/17539261111183407",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "165--184",
journal = "Journal of European Real Estate Research",
issn = "1753-9269",
number = "3",

}

The risk free rate of return in UK property pricing. / Hutchison, Norman; Fraser, Patricia; Adair, Alastair; Rahul, Srivatsa.

In: Journal of European Real Estate Research, Vol. 4, No. 3, 29.11.2011, p. 165-184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The risk free rate of return in UK property pricing

AU - Hutchison, Norman

AU - Fraser, Patricia

AU - Adair, Alastair

AU - Rahul, Srivatsa

PY - 2011/11/29

Y1 - 2011/11/29

N2 - Purpose - The aim of this paper is to consider the appropriate benchmark risk free rate sui for pricing of property investments in the UK and, in doing so, investigate the financial characteristics and performance of the UK gilt yields. European investors have been significant players in the UK commercial property market during the last decade and in order to be competitive in bidding situations with UK-based investors, require to be aware of the pricing criteria adopted. Design/methodology/approach - This paper analyses the stability, yield distribution and volatility of both conventional gilts and index-linked gilts with different maturities over the period 1980-2010. It considers the changing structure of the UK commercial property market and reports on a questionnaire survey of the UK property investment community, which focused on the rationale behind the selection of the appropriate risk free rate of return. Findings - The analysis suggests that ten-year index-linked gilts have been the most stable, but that if conventional gilts are preferred, then five-year nominal appear to be more stable than ten-year nominal; ten-year real yields are smoother and relatively less volatile. In the authors' survey of the UK property investment fund managers and their advisors, the majority, but by no means all of the respondents, used the ten-year nominal gilt yield as their risk free rate of return. However, questions were raised as to whether it was appropriate to use spot or average gilt yields, particularly when rates in 2009/2010 had fallen to such low level. Originality/value - The findings provide a better understanding of how the different maturities of gilts behave. Insight is given on the criteria adopted by investors when selecting the risk free rate.

AB - Purpose - The aim of this paper is to consider the appropriate benchmark risk free rate sui for pricing of property investments in the UK and, in doing so, investigate the financial characteristics and performance of the UK gilt yields. European investors have been significant players in the UK commercial property market during the last decade and in order to be competitive in bidding situations with UK-based investors, require to be aware of the pricing criteria adopted. Design/methodology/approach - This paper analyses the stability, yield distribution and volatility of both conventional gilts and index-linked gilts with different maturities over the period 1980-2010. It considers the changing structure of the UK commercial property market and reports on a questionnaire survey of the UK property investment community, which focused on the rationale behind the selection of the appropriate risk free rate of return. Findings - The analysis suggests that ten-year index-linked gilts have been the most stable, but that if conventional gilts are preferred, then five-year nominal appear to be more stable than ten-year nominal; ten-year real yields are smoother and relatively less volatile. In the authors' survey of the UK property investment fund managers and their advisors, the majority, but by no means all of the respondents, used the ten-year nominal gilt yield as their risk free rate of return. However, questions were raised as to whether it was appropriate to use spot or average gilt yields, particularly when rates in 2009/2010 had fallen to such low level. Originality/value - The findings provide a better understanding of how the different maturities of gilts behave. Insight is given on the criteria adopted by investors when selecting the risk free rate.

U2 - 10.1108/17539261111183407

DO - 10.1108/17539261111183407

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 165

EP - 184

JO - Journal of European Real Estate Research

T2 - Journal of European Real Estate Research

JF - Journal of European Real Estate Research

SN - 1753-9269

IS - 3

ER -