Abstract
This paper by Ulisses Terto Neto (UEG, Brazil) and Siobhán Wills (Ulster University, UK) argues that routine use of militarised policing in Brazil violates the right to mental health of residents of vulnerable and marginalised communities. The right to mental health is protected in international and regional human rights treaties as well as the Brazilian Constitution. Collectively these impose three levels of obligations on Brazil – to respect, protect, and fulfil. This paper argues that by ignoring the substantial evidence that its actions, policies and programs on militarised policing are compromising people’s mental health, Brazil is in violation of its treaty and constitutional obligations concerning the right to mental health.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-26 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | The UNIFACS Law Review – Virtual Debate, QUALIS A2 |
| Volume | 311 |
| Early online date | 1 May 2026 |
| Publication status | Published online - 1 May 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'THE RIGHT TO MENTAL HEALTH IN THE CONTEXT OF MILITARISED POLICING IN BRAZIL'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver