The Reliability and Validity of a Novel Clinical Test for Assessing Shoulder Rotation ROM in Collegiate Baseball Players: Functional Assessment of System Tension of the Shoulder (FAST-SHDR)

Background Traditional methods to measure rotational passive range of motion (PROM) in the throwing shoulder do not reflect the complexity of the throwing motion. Therefore, a sport specific shoulder rotation PROM test (FAST-SHDR) was developed and compared to traditional standard methods to measure shoulder internal and external rotational PROM in the throwing shoulder. Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the intra-rater reliability of the FAST-SHDR test in young, healthy, male Division 1 baseball players. Study Design Reliability and validity analysis Methods A study with 49 healthy participants (31 collegiate baseball players, 18 controls) examined a sport specific shoulder rotation PROM test (FAST-SHDR) and compared this to the standard supine 90/90 shoulder in a single session assessment. Intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) were calculated. Within and between group differences were based on t-tests (p<0.001), absolute differences and effect sizes (95% CIs). Results The novel test (FAST-SHDR) had good to excellent reliability with ICCs ranging from 0.95 (0.89 to 0.98) to 0.96 (0.92-0.98). MDC ranged from 7°-11° which is equivalent to 11-14% of mean PROM scores. In the dominant shoulder of baseballers, when FAST-SHDR IR/ER was compared to standard IR/ER testing the FAST-SHDR scores were lower for both IR (MD 23.3°; 95% CI 19.7-26.8) and ER (MD 50.7°; 95% 44.7 to 56.7). Comparing the shoulder rotation PROM in baseballers, the FAST-SHDR ER and IR measurements were significantly lower (p<0.0001) when compared to traditional standard PROM testing for shoulder IR and ER rotation. Conclusions FAST-SHDR testing shows good to excellent intra-rater reliability for measuring shoulder rotational PROM and demonstrates both face and discriminant validity. Level of Evidence 3