The Redundancy of Positivism as a Paradigm for Nursing Research

Margarita Corry, Sam Porter, Hugh P. McKenna

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

New nursing researchers are faced with a smorgasbord of competing methodologies. Sometimes, they are encouraged to adopt the research paradigms beloved of their senior colleagues. This is a problem if those paradigms are no longer of contemporary methodological relevance. The aim of this paper was to provide clarity about current research paradigms. It seeks to interrogate the continuing viability of positivism as a guiding paradigm for nursing research. It does this by critically analysing the methodological literature. Five major paradigms are addressed: the positivist; the interpretivist/constructivist; the transformative; the realist; and the postpositivist. Acceptance of interpretivist, transformative or realist approaches necessarily entails wholesale rejection of positivism, while acceptance of postpositivism involves its partial rejection. Postpositivism has superseded positivism as the guiding paradigm of the scientific method. The incorporation in randomized controlled trials of postpositivist assumptions indicates that even on the methodological territory that it once claimed as its own, positivism has been rendered redundant as an appropriate paradigm for contemporary nursing research.
LanguageEnglish
Article numbere12230
Pages1-10
JournalNursing Philosophy
Volume20
Issue number1
Early online date15 Nov 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 15 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

positivism
redundancy
nursing
paradigm
acceptance
methodology

Keywords

  • constructivism
  • interpretivism
  • positivism
  • postpositivism
  • realism
  • research methodology

Cite this

Corry, Margarita ; Porter, Sam ; McKenna, Hugh P. / The Redundancy of Positivism as a Paradigm for Nursing Research. In: Nursing Philosophy. 2018 ; Vol. 20, No. 1. pp. 1-10.
@article{344e214474c54cc5a3a3d7869408aec9,
title = "The Redundancy of Positivism as a Paradigm for Nursing Research",
abstract = "New nursing researchers are faced with a smorgasbord of competing methodologies. Sometimes, they are encouraged to adopt the research paradigms beloved of their senior colleagues. This is a problem if those paradigms are no longer of contemporary methodological relevance. The aim of this paper was to provide clarity about current research paradigms. It seeks to interrogate the continuing viability of positivism as a guiding paradigm for nursing research. It does this by critically analysing the methodological literature. Five major paradigms are addressed: the positivist; the interpretivist/constructivist; the transformative; the realist; and the postpositivist. Acceptance of interpretivist, transformative or realist approaches necessarily entails wholesale rejection of positivism, while acceptance of postpositivism involves its partial rejection. Postpositivism has superseded positivism as the guiding paradigm of the scientific method. The incorporation in randomized controlled trials of postpositivist assumptions indicates that even on the methodological territory that it once claimed as its own, positivism has been rendered redundant as an appropriate paradigm for contemporary nursing research.",
keywords = "constructivism , interpretivism , positivism , postpositivism , realism , research methodology",
author = "Margarita Corry and Sam Porter and McKenna, {Hugh P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1111/nup.12230",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Nursing Philosophy",
issn = "1466-7681",
number = "1",

}

Corry, M, Porter, S & McKenna, HP 2018, 'The Redundancy of Positivism as a Paradigm for Nursing Research', Nursing Philosophy, vol. 20, no. 1, e12230, pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12230

The Redundancy of Positivism as a Paradigm for Nursing Research. / Corry, Margarita; Porter, Sam; McKenna, Hugh P.

In: Nursing Philosophy, Vol. 20, No. 1, e12230, 15.11.2018, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Redundancy of Positivism as a Paradigm for Nursing Research

AU - Corry, Margarita

AU - Porter, Sam

AU - McKenna, Hugh P.

PY - 2018/11/15

Y1 - 2018/11/15

N2 - New nursing researchers are faced with a smorgasbord of competing methodologies. Sometimes, they are encouraged to adopt the research paradigms beloved of their senior colleagues. This is a problem if those paradigms are no longer of contemporary methodological relevance. The aim of this paper was to provide clarity about current research paradigms. It seeks to interrogate the continuing viability of positivism as a guiding paradigm for nursing research. It does this by critically analysing the methodological literature. Five major paradigms are addressed: the positivist; the interpretivist/constructivist; the transformative; the realist; and the postpositivist. Acceptance of interpretivist, transformative or realist approaches necessarily entails wholesale rejection of positivism, while acceptance of postpositivism involves its partial rejection. Postpositivism has superseded positivism as the guiding paradigm of the scientific method. The incorporation in randomized controlled trials of postpositivist assumptions indicates that even on the methodological territory that it once claimed as its own, positivism has been rendered redundant as an appropriate paradigm for contemporary nursing research.

AB - New nursing researchers are faced with a smorgasbord of competing methodologies. Sometimes, they are encouraged to adopt the research paradigms beloved of their senior colleagues. This is a problem if those paradigms are no longer of contemporary methodological relevance. The aim of this paper was to provide clarity about current research paradigms. It seeks to interrogate the continuing viability of positivism as a guiding paradigm for nursing research. It does this by critically analysing the methodological literature. Five major paradigms are addressed: the positivist; the interpretivist/constructivist; the transformative; the realist; and the postpositivist. Acceptance of interpretivist, transformative or realist approaches necessarily entails wholesale rejection of positivism, while acceptance of postpositivism involves its partial rejection. Postpositivism has superseded positivism as the guiding paradigm of the scientific method. The incorporation in randomized controlled trials of postpositivist assumptions indicates that even on the methodological territory that it once claimed as its own, positivism has been rendered redundant as an appropriate paradigm for contemporary nursing research.

KW - constructivism

KW - interpretivism

KW - positivism

KW - postpositivism

KW - realism

KW - research methodology

U2 - 10.1111/nup.12230

DO - 10.1111/nup.12230

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Nursing Philosophy

T2 - Nursing Philosophy

JF - Nursing Philosophy

SN - 1466-7681

IS - 1

M1 - e12230

ER -