Abstract
| Language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 124-5 |
| Journal | British Journal of Sports Medicine |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 2002 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
The quality of research in sports journals. / Bleakley, C; MacAuley, D.
In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2002, p. 124-5.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - The quality of research in sports journals.
AU - Bleakley, C
AU - MacAuley, D
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence base of sports medicine research. METHODS: A sample of four major journals that present core research in sport and exercise medicine (British Journal of Sports Medicine, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, and Physical Therapy) was examined using assessment criteria taken from the READER method. RESULTS: Randomised controlled trials comprised 10% or less of all original research articles. Observational/descriptive studies were the most commonly published study design. There was a highly significant difference (p
AB - OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence base of sports medicine research. METHODS: A sample of four major journals that present core research in sport and exercise medicine (British Journal of Sports Medicine, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, and Physical Therapy) was examined using assessment criteria taken from the READER method. RESULTS: Randomised controlled trials comprised 10% or less of all original research articles. Observational/descriptive studies were the most commonly published study design. There was a highly significant difference (p
M3 - Article
VL - 36
SP - 124
EP - 125
JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine
T2 - British Journal of Sports Medicine
JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine
SN - 0306-3674
IS - 2
ER -