The quality of research in sports journals.

C Bleakley, D MacAuley

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    23 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence base of sports medicine research. METHODS: A sample of four major journals that present core research in sport and exercise medicine (British Journal of Sports Medicine, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, and Physical Therapy) was examined using assessment criteria taken from the READER method. RESULTS: Randomised controlled trials comprised 10% or less of all original research articles. Observational/descriptive studies were the most commonly published study design. There was a highly significant difference (p
    LanguageEnglish
    Pages124-5
    JournalBritish Journal of Sports Medicine
    Volume36
    Issue number2
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Fingerprint

    Sports Medicine
    Sports
    Research
    Physical Fitness
    Observational Studies
    Randomized Controlled Trials
    Medicine
    Therapeutics

    Cite this

    @article{ccca94bf6fc645e2a79d5a450277786d,
    title = "The quality of research in sports journals.",
    abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence base of sports medicine research. METHODS: A sample of four major journals that present core research in sport and exercise medicine (British Journal of Sports Medicine, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, and Physical Therapy) was examined using assessment criteria taken from the READER method. RESULTS: Randomised controlled trials comprised 10{\%} or less of all original research articles. Observational/descriptive studies were the most commonly published study design. There was a highly significant difference (p",
    author = "C Bleakley and D MacAuley",
    year = "2002",
    language = "English",
    volume = "36",
    pages = "124--5",
    journal = "British Journal of Sports Medicine",
    issn = "0306-3674",
    number = "2",

    }

    The quality of research in sports journals. / Bleakley, C; MacAuley, D.

    In: British Journal of Sports Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 2, 2002, p. 124-5.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - The quality of research in sports journals.

    AU - Bleakley, C

    AU - MacAuley, D

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence base of sports medicine research. METHODS: A sample of four major journals that present core research in sport and exercise medicine (British Journal of Sports Medicine, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, and Physical Therapy) was examined using assessment criteria taken from the READER method. RESULTS: Randomised controlled trials comprised 10% or less of all original research articles. Observational/descriptive studies were the most commonly published study design. There was a highly significant difference (p

    AB - OBJECTIVE: To examine the evidence base of sports medicine research. METHODS: A sample of four major journals that present core research in sport and exercise medicine (British Journal of Sports Medicine, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, and Physical Therapy) was examined using assessment criteria taken from the READER method. RESULTS: Randomised controlled trials comprised 10% or less of all original research articles. Observational/descriptive studies were the most commonly published study design. There was a highly significant difference (p

    M3 - Article

    VL - 36

    SP - 124

    EP - 125

    JO - British Journal of Sports Medicine

    T2 - British Journal of Sports Medicine

    JF - British Journal of Sports Medicine

    SN - 0306-3674

    IS - 2

    ER -