The Private Finance Initiative: Has the Accounting Standards Board Reduced theScheme’s Value for Money?

Robert Kirk, Anthony Wall

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines the state of PFI in the UK following an amendment published by the ASB to FRS 5. It was predicted that this amendment would mean that most properties constructed by the private sector, on behalf of the public sector, would have suddenly to appear on the balance sheets of the latter. This would have led to an unacceptable levelof public sector borrowing and could have undermined the entire rationale for the scheme. Having outlined the objectives of PFI and explained the attitude adopted by the ASB, the article examines the reaction of HM Treasury. The article then demonstrates the likely consequences of the main parties in PFI contracts passing on as much risk as possible to the private sector so as to ensure that the assets remain off balance sheet. It concludes by assessing the expected impact that these actions will have on value for money.
LanguageEnglish
Pages529-547
JournalPublic Management Review
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Finance
Accounting standards
Public sector
Amendments
Private sector
Value for money
Private finance initiative
Balance sheet
Borrowing
Rationale
Assets

Cite this

@article{ac782636cbd742b2bf3bce75b5aa0f2c,
title = "The Private Finance Initiative: Has the Accounting Standards Board Reduced theScheme’s Value for Money?",
abstract = "This article examines the state of PFI in the UK following an amendment published by the ASB to FRS 5. It was predicted that this amendment would mean that most properties constructed by the private sector, on behalf of the public sector, would have suddenly to appear on the balance sheets of the latter. This would have led to an unacceptable levelof public sector borrowing and could have undermined the entire rationale for the scheme. Having outlined the objectives of PFI and explained the attitude adopted by the ASB, the article examines the reaction of HM Treasury. The article then demonstrates the likely consequences of the main parties in PFI contracts passing on as much risk as possible to the private sector so as to ensure that the assets remain off balance sheet. It concludes by assessing the expected impact that these actions will have on value for money.",
author = "Robert Kirk and Anthony Wall",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1080/14616670210163051",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "529--547",
journal = "Public Management Review",
issn = "1471-9037",
number = "4",

}

The Private Finance Initiative: Has the Accounting Standards Board Reduced theScheme’s Value for Money? / Kirk, Robert; Wall, Anthony.

In: Public Management Review, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2002, p. 529-547.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Private Finance Initiative: Has the Accounting Standards Board Reduced theScheme’s Value for Money?

AU - Kirk, Robert

AU - Wall, Anthony

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This article examines the state of PFI in the UK following an amendment published by the ASB to FRS 5. It was predicted that this amendment would mean that most properties constructed by the private sector, on behalf of the public sector, would have suddenly to appear on the balance sheets of the latter. This would have led to an unacceptable levelof public sector borrowing and could have undermined the entire rationale for the scheme. Having outlined the objectives of PFI and explained the attitude adopted by the ASB, the article examines the reaction of HM Treasury. The article then demonstrates the likely consequences of the main parties in PFI contracts passing on as much risk as possible to the private sector so as to ensure that the assets remain off balance sheet. It concludes by assessing the expected impact that these actions will have on value for money.

AB - This article examines the state of PFI in the UK following an amendment published by the ASB to FRS 5. It was predicted that this amendment would mean that most properties constructed by the private sector, on behalf of the public sector, would have suddenly to appear on the balance sheets of the latter. This would have led to an unacceptable levelof public sector borrowing and could have undermined the entire rationale for the scheme. Having outlined the objectives of PFI and explained the attitude adopted by the ASB, the article examines the reaction of HM Treasury. The article then demonstrates the likely consequences of the main parties in PFI contracts passing on as much risk as possible to the private sector so as to ensure that the assets remain off balance sheet. It concludes by assessing the expected impact that these actions will have on value for money.

U2 - 10.1080/14616670210163051

DO - 10.1080/14616670210163051

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 529

EP - 547

JO - Public Management Review

T2 - Public Management Review

JF - Public Management Review

SN - 1471-9037

IS - 4

ER -