The photographic portrait: a means to surveillance and subversion

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The surveillance model, most notably expounded by John Tagg, has long held orthodoxy in photographic theory. In this reading, the lowering of the gaze of the camera, far from being inclusive, acts when a tool of state, to be a means for exclusion. In essence, what we recognise as the mugshot is a highly coded form of portraiture. I argue that a general knowingness about the conventions of photographic portraiture in the nineteenth and early twentieth-centuries allowed the intended discursive power of a regime of visibility to be undermined, contested and destabilised through acts of dissembling, resistance and counter-strategies that drew on the conventions of honorific portraiture. To support this argument this article focuses on photographs of the Fenians (a secret, oath bearing separatist Irish nationalist organisation) who both were photographed as prisoners and commissioned portraits of themselves to further their radical cause.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-23
Number of pages23
JournalEarly Popular Visual Culture
Volume16
Issue number1
Early online date30 May 2018
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 30 May 2018

Fingerprint

Surveillance
Portraiture
Subversion
Prisoners
Essence
Causes
Exclusion
Honorifics
Nationalists
Oaths
Visibility
Discursive
Orthodoxy

Keywords

  • honorific portraiture
  • regime of visibility
  • counter narrative
  • mugshot
  • subversion
  • popular practice

Cite this

@article{8005c3d0404749aeb42f604ac2db0c39,
title = "The photographic portrait: a means to surveillance and subversion",
abstract = "The surveillance model, most notably expounded by John Tagg, has long held orthodoxy in photographic theory. In this reading, the lowering of the gaze of the camera, far from being inclusive, acts when a tool of state, to be a means for exclusion. In essence, what we recognise as the mugshot is a highly coded form of portraiture. I argue that a general knowingness about the conventions of photographic portraiture in the nineteenth and early twentieth-centuries allowed the intended discursive power of a regime of visibility to be undermined, contested and destabilised through acts of dissembling, resistance and counter-strategies that drew on the conventions of honorific portraiture. To support this argument this article focuses on photographs of the Fenians (a secret, oath bearing separatist Irish nationalist organisation) who both were photographed as prisoners and commissioned portraits of themselves to further their radical cause.",
keywords = "honorific portraiture , regime of visibility, counter narrative, mugshot, subversion, popular practice",
author = "Gail Baylis",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1080/17460654.2018.1472023",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "Early Popular Visual Culture",
issn = "1746-0654",
number = "1",

}

The photographic portrait : a means to surveillance and subversion. / Baylis, Gail.

In: Early Popular Visual Culture, Vol. 16, No. 1, 30.05.2018, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The photographic portrait

T2 - Early Popular Visual Culture

AU - Baylis, Gail

PY - 2018/5/30

Y1 - 2018/5/30

N2 - The surveillance model, most notably expounded by John Tagg, has long held orthodoxy in photographic theory. In this reading, the lowering of the gaze of the camera, far from being inclusive, acts when a tool of state, to be a means for exclusion. In essence, what we recognise as the mugshot is a highly coded form of portraiture. I argue that a general knowingness about the conventions of photographic portraiture in the nineteenth and early twentieth-centuries allowed the intended discursive power of a regime of visibility to be undermined, contested and destabilised through acts of dissembling, resistance and counter-strategies that drew on the conventions of honorific portraiture. To support this argument this article focuses on photographs of the Fenians (a secret, oath bearing separatist Irish nationalist organisation) who both were photographed as prisoners and commissioned portraits of themselves to further their radical cause.

AB - The surveillance model, most notably expounded by John Tagg, has long held orthodoxy in photographic theory. In this reading, the lowering of the gaze of the camera, far from being inclusive, acts when a tool of state, to be a means for exclusion. In essence, what we recognise as the mugshot is a highly coded form of portraiture. I argue that a general knowingness about the conventions of photographic portraiture in the nineteenth and early twentieth-centuries allowed the intended discursive power of a regime of visibility to be undermined, contested and destabilised through acts of dissembling, resistance and counter-strategies that drew on the conventions of honorific portraiture. To support this argument this article focuses on photographs of the Fenians (a secret, oath bearing separatist Irish nationalist organisation) who both were photographed as prisoners and commissioned portraits of themselves to further their radical cause.

KW - honorific portraiture

KW - regime of visibility

KW - counter narrative

KW - mugshot

KW - subversion

KW - popular practice

U2 - 10.1080/17460654.2018.1472023

DO - 10.1080/17460654.2018.1472023

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - Early Popular Visual Culture

JF - Early Popular Visual Culture

SN - 1746-0654

IS - 1

ER -