The Paradox of Transition in Conflicted Democracies

Colm Campbell, Fionnuala Ni Aolain

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Transitional Justice discourses have largely focused on "paradigmatic transitions." Such analyses emphasize dealing with the human rights abuses committed by prior authoritarian or illegitimate regimes. But, authoritarian entities may not be the only kind of states with a legacy of serious and systematic rights -violations, A similar legacy may manifest in broadly democratic states that have experienced prolonged political violence. These "conflicted democracies present a number of paradoxes, which come to the fore when peace and transitional political process are agreed, thereby providing unique challenges in political and legal transformation. This article explores these paradoxes and challenges. It further draws out a more nuanced understand of the transitional process by conceptually separating war/peace transitions from illiberal polity/democracy transitions.
LanguageEnglish
Pages172-213
JournalHuman Rights Quarterly
Volume27
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

peace
democracy
political violence
human rights
abuse
justice
regime
discourse

Keywords

  • transitional justice
  • transition

Cite this

Campbell, C., & Ni Aolain, F. (2005). The Paradox of Transition in Conflicted Democracies. Human Rights Quarterly, 27, 172-213.
Campbell, Colm ; Ni Aolain, Fionnuala. / The Paradox of Transition in Conflicted Democracies. In: Human Rights Quarterly. 2005 ; Vol. 27. pp. 172-213.
@article{dde8fd8682094ab08b3fcdaceabd1439,
title = "The Paradox of Transition in Conflicted Democracies",
abstract = "Transitional Justice discourses have largely focused on {"}paradigmatic transitions.{"} Such analyses emphasize dealing with the human rights abuses committed by prior authoritarian or illegitimate regimes. But, authoritarian entities may not be the only kind of states with a legacy of serious and systematic rights -violations, A similar legacy may manifest in broadly democratic states that have experienced prolonged political violence. These {"}conflicted democracies present a number of paradoxes, which come to the fore when peace and transitional political process are agreed, thereby providing unique challenges in political and legal transformation. This article explores these paradoxes and challenges. It further draws out a more nuanced understand of the transitional process by conceptually separating war/peace transitions from illiberal polity/democracy transitions.",
keywords = "transitional justice, transition",
author = "Colm Campbell and {Ni Aolain}, Fionnuala",
year = "2005",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "172--213",
journal = "Human Rights Quarterly",
issn = "0275-0392",

}

Campbell, C & Ni Aolain, F 2005, 'The Paradox of Transition in Conflicted Democracies', Human Rights Quarterly, vol. 27, pp. 172-213.

The Paradox of Transition in Conflicted Democracies. / Campbell, Colm; Ni Aolain, Fionnuala.

In: Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 27, 2005, p. 172-213.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Paradox of Transition in Conflicted Democracies

AU - Campbell, Colm

AU - Ni Aolain, Fionnuala

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Transitional Justice discourses have largely focused on "paradigmatic transitions." Such analyses emphasize dealing with the human rights abuses committed by prior authoritarian or illegitimate regimes. But, authoritarian entities may not be the only kind of states with a legacy of serious and systematic rights -violations, A similar legacy may manifest in broadly democratic states that have experienced prolonged political violence. These "conflicted democracies present a number of paradoxes, which come to the fore when peace and transitional political process are agreed, thereby providing unique challenges in political and legal transformation. This article explores these paradoxes and challenges. It further draws out a more nuanced understand of the transitional process by conceptually separating war/peace transitions from illiberal polity/democracy transitions.

AB - Transitional Justice discourses have largely focused on "paradigmatic transitions." Such analyses emphasize dealing with the human rights abuses committed by prior authoritarian or illegitimate regimes. But, authoritarian entities may not be the only kind of states with a legacy of serious and systematic rights -violations, A similar legacy may manifest in broadly democratic states that have experienced prolonged political violence. These "conflicted democracies present a number of paradoxes, which come to the fore when peace and transitional political process are agreed, thereby providing unique challenges in political and legal transformation. This article explores these paradoxes and challenges. It further draws out a more nuanced understand of the transitional process by conceptually separating war/peace transitions from illiberal polity/democracy transitions.

KW - transitional justice

KW - transition

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 172

EP - 213

JO - Human Rights Quarterly

T2 - Human Rights Quarterly

JF - Human Rights Quarterly

SN - 0275-0392

ER -