The ‘Necessity' of Austerity and its Relationship with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Case Study of Ireland and the United Kingdom

Charles O'Sullivan, Donna McNamara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

43 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Following the Global Financial Crisis of 2008, contractions in the global economy were often utilised as a justification for deep cuts in State spending, including welfare state programmes. This article will problematise the ‘necessity’ of austerity measures and how this conflicts with the intentions of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD), which requires State intervention to ensure the right to a minimum standard of living (Article 28 CRPD) for such persons. By comparing the arguably voluntary and ideologically-driven austerity programme undertaken in the United Kingdom with the externally imposed ‘Bailout Package' in Ireland, it will address whether the Convention may, in limited circumstances, allow for programmes such as these to be deemed compatible with the CRPD among developed States.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)157-185
Number of pages9
JournalHuman Rights Law Review
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date8 Jan 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished (in print/issue) - 31 Mar 2021

Keywords

  • human rights
  • disability
  • austerity
  • the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
  • social rights

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ‘Necessity' of Austerity and its Relationship with the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A Case Study of Ireland and the United Kingdom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this