The Limits of Regulatory Science in Transnational Governance of Transgenic Plant Agriculture and Food Systems

Taiwo Oriola

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The current national and transnational regulatory and policy framework for transgenic plantagriculture and food is arguably largely defined by science. Notably, transgenic plantagriculture policy deference to science is ostensibly premised on the general perception thatscience is neutral, objective, reliable, and agnostic. This is exemplified by cases ranging from Alliance for Bio-integrity v Donna Shalala, European Communities: Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, to European Commission v Republic ofPoland , in which conscientious, ethical, religious, and cultural oppositional grounds totransgenic plant agriculture and food were trumped by scientific imperatives. However, thelack of unanimity of views amongst scientists on the degree of susceptibility of transgenicplant food to new toxins and allergens; the continuing scientific uncertainties on theproprieties and full ramifications of transgenic plant agriculture and food respectively for theenvironment and public health; and the seeming inevitability ofin situ gene flow andadventitious commingling of transgenic and non-transgenic plant genes; could arguablyundermine the presumed reliability, neutrality, objectivity, and agnosticism of the“science” that underpins the regulatory and policy framework for transgenic plant technologygovernance, and concomitantly cast doubts on the propriety of the current science-centricregulatory framework for transgenic plant agricultural technology. Drawing on relevant caselaw and selected case studies, this essay explores the extent to which science is ultimatelyreliable, objective, agnostic, or neutral in its pivotal role as the fulcrum anchoring theregulatory and governance systems for transgenic plant agriculture and food systems.
LanguageEnglish
Pages757-883
JournalNorth Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation
Volume39
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 31 Mar 2014

Fingerprint

transgenic plant
agriculture
food
agricultural technology
European Commission
toxin
gene flow
public health
marketing
European Union
science
gene
policy

Keywords

  • Transgenic plant agriculture
  • transgenic plant foods
  • substantial equivalence
  • conventional agriculture
  • regulatory science
  • research science
  • evolutionary science
  • exact science
  • normative science
  • science neutrality
  • science agnosticism
  • science determinism
  • safety science

Cite this

@article{6fa68b03375e4b878909f10e8f29e144,
title = "The Limits of Regulatory Science in Transnational Governance of Transgenic Plant Agriculture and Food Systems",
abstract = "The current national and transnational regulatory and policy framework for transgenic plantagriculture and food is arguably largely defined by science. Notably, transgenic plantagriculture policy deference to science is ostensibly premised on the general perception thatscience is neutral, objective, reliable, and agnostic. This is exemplified by cases ranging from Alliance for Bio-integrity v Donna Shalala, European Communities: Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, to European Commission v Republic ofPoland , in which conscientious, ethical, religious, and cultural oppositional grounds totransgenic plant agriculture and food were trumped by scientific imperatives. However, thelack of unanimity of views amongst scientists on the degree of susceptibility of transgenicplant food to new toxins and allergens; the continuing scientific uncertainties on theproprieties and full ramifications of transgenic plant agriculture and food respectively for theenvironment and public health; and the seeming inevitability ofin situ gene flow andadventitious commingling of transgenic and non-transgenic plant genes; could arguablyundermine the presumed reliability, neutrality, objectivity, and agnosticism of the“science” that underpins the regulatory and policy framework for transgenic plant technologygovernance, and concomitantly cast doubts on the propriety of the current science-centricregulatory framework for transgenic plant agricultural technology. Drawing on relevant caselaw and selected case studies, this essay explores the extent to which science is ultimatelyreliable, objective, agnostic, or neutral in its pivotal role as the fulcrum anchoring theregulatory and governance systems for transgenic plant agriculture and food systems.",
keywords = "Transgenic plant agriculture, transgenic plant foods, substantial equivalence, conventional agriculture, regulatory science, research science, evolutionary science, exact science, normative science, science neutrality, science agnosticism, science determinism, safety science",
author = "Taiwo Oriola",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "31",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "757--883",
journal = "North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation",
issn = "0743-1759",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Limits of Regulatory Science in Transnational Governance of Transgenic Plant Agriculture and Food Systems

AU - Oriola, Taiwo

PY - 2014/3/31

Y1 - 2014/3/31

N2 - The current national and transnational regulatory and policy framework for transgenic plantagriculture and food is arguably largely defined by science. Notably, transgenic plantagriculture policy deference to science is ostensibly premised on the general perception thatscience is neutral, objective, reliable, and agnostic. This is exemplified by cases ranging from Alliance for Bio-integrity v Donna Shalala, European Communities: Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, to European Commission v Republic ofPoland , in which conscientious, ethical, religious, and cultural oppositional grounds totransgenic plant agriculture and food were trumped by scientific imperatives. However, thelack of unanimity of views amongst scientists on the degree of susceptibility of transgenicplant food to new toxins and allergens; the continuing scientific uncertainties on theproprieties and full ramifications of transgenic plant agriculture and food respectively for theenvironment and public health; and the seeming inevitability ofin situ gene flow andadventitious commingling of transgenic and non-transgenic plant genes; could arguablyundermine the presumed reliability, neutrality, objectivity, and agnosticism of the“science” that underpins the regulatory and policy framework for transgenic plant technologygovernance, and concomitantly cast doubts on the propriety of the current science-centricregulatory framework for transgenic plant agricultural technology. Drawing on relevant caselaw and selected case studies, this essay explores the extent to which science is ultimatelyreliable, objective, agnostic, or neutral in its pivotal role as the fulcrum anchoring theregulatory and governance systems for transgenic plant agriculture and food systems.

AB - The current national and transnational regulatory and policy framework for transgenic plantagriculture and food is arguably largely defined by science. Notably, transgenic plantagriculture policy deference to science is ostensibly premised on the general perception thatscience is neutral, objective, reliable, and agnostic. This is exemplified by cases ranging from Alliance for Bio-integrity v Donna Shalala, European Communities: Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products, to European Commission v Republic ofPoland , in which conscientious, ethical, religious, and cultural oppositional grounds totransgenic plant agriculture and food were trumped by scientific imperatives. However, thelack of unanimity of views amongst scientists on the degree of susceptibility of transgenicplant food to new toxins and allergens; the continuing scientific uncertainties on theproprieties and full ramifications of transgenic plant agriculture and food respectively for theenvironment and public health; and the seeming inevitability ofin situ gene flow andadventitious commingling of transgenic and non-transgenic plant genes; could arguablyundermine the presumed reliability, neutrality, objectivity, and agnosticism of the“science” that underpins the regulatory and policy framework for transgenic plant technologygovernance, and concomitantly cast doubts on the propriety of the current science-centricregulatory framework for transgenic plant agricultural technology. Drawing on relevant caselaw and selected case studies, this essay explores the extent to which science is ultimatelyreliable, objective, agnostic, or neutral in its pivotal role as the fulcrum anchoring theregulatory and governance systems for transgenic plant agriculture and food systems.

KW - Transgenic plant agriculture

KW - transgenic plant foods

KW - substantial equivalence

KW - conventional agriculture

KW - regulatory science

KW - research science

KW - evolutionary science

KW - exact science

KW - normative science

KW - science neutrality

KW - science agnosticism

KW - science determinism

KW - safety science

UR - https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ncjint39&id=701&collection=journals&index=

UR - https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/en/publications/the-limits-of-regulatory-science-in-transnational-governance-of-t-3

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 757

EP - 883

JO - North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation

T2 - North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation

JF - North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation

SN - 0743-1759

IS - 3

ER -