TY - JOUR
T1 - The Impact of Peripheral Venous Catheter Procedural Kits on Improving Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalised Patients
AU - Burnett, Kathryn
AU - McCarron, P. A.
AU - Scott, Michael
AU - McKee, Pat
AU - Conlon-Bingham, Geraldine
AU - Farren, David
AU - Tate, Alan
AU - Murray, Stuart
AU - Dunne, Eoin
AU - Callaghan, Liam
PY - 2019/7/17
Y1 - 2019/7/17
N2 - Introduction: Peripheral Venous Catheters (PVC) are an essential component in modern healthcare and their inclusion into a Clinical Procedure
Pack has been identified as an area of healthcare where an enhancement in design and implementation could improve practitioner performance and
associated patient outcomes.
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of two interventions;
i. procedural kits with an enhanced training programme
ii. a specific feedback mechanism on the rates of inappropriate removal of PVCs within Antrim Area Hospital.
Methods: A time series design, using retrospective and prospective data was used. The study consisted of three phases. Phase A aimed to
establish existing PVC adverse event rates. Phase B included the introduction and assessment of the first intervention, a PVC procedural kit and
associated training package, to specific clinical areas. Phase C involved the introduction and assessment of the second intervention, a performance
feedback mechanism.
Results: Analysis of data showed that the difference of mean PVC clinical adverse event rate between Phase A 12.84% (95% CI: 10.86 – 15.03)
and Phase B of 9.48% (95% CI: 8.10 – 11.00) was improved (p=0.008). Similarly, the PVC clinical adverse event rate of Phase B of 9.48% (95% CI:
8.10 – 11.00) and Phase C of 5.94% (95% CI: 4.78 – 7.30), was improved (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: In conclusion, the study demonstrated the benefit of introducing a PVC procedural kit with an enhanced training programme and a
specific feedback mechanism to significantly reduce clinical adverse events, compared to the previous standard practice.
AB - Introduction: Peripheral Venous Catheters (PVC) are an essential component in modern healthcare and their inclusion into a Clinical Procedure
Pack has been identified as an area of healthcare where an enhancement in design and implementation could improve practitioner performance and
associated patient outcomes.
Aim: The aim of this study was to assess the clinical impact of two interventions;
i. procedural kits with an enhanced training programme
ii. a specific feedback mechanism on the rates of inappropriate removal of PVCs within Antrim Area Hospital.
Methods: A time series design, using retrospective and prospective data was used. The study consisted of three phases. Phase A aimed to
establish existing PVC adverse event rates. Phase B included the introduction and assessment of the first intervention, a PVC procedural kit and
associated training package, to specific clinical areas. Phase C involved the introduction and assessment of the second intervention, a performance
feedback mechanism.
Results: Analysis of data showed that the difference of mean PVC clinical adverse event rate between Phase A 12.84% (95% CI: 10.86 – 15.03)
and Phase B of 9.48% (95% CI: 8.10 – 11.00) was improved (p=0.008). Similarly, the PVC clinical adverse event rate of Phase B of 9.48% (95% CI:
8.10 – 11.00) and Phase C of 5.94% (95% CI: 4.78 – 7.30), was improved (P < 0.001).
Conclusion: In conclusion, the study demonstrated the benefit of introducing a PVC procedural kit with an enhanced training programme and a
specific feedback mechanism to significantly reduce clinical adverse events, compared to the previous standard practice.
KW - PVC
KW - Adverse events
KW - Procedural packs
KW - Clinical outcomes
UR - https://pure.ulster.ac.uk/en/publications/the-impact-of-peripheral-venous-catheter-procedural-kits-on-impro
U2 - 10.33552/APPR.2019.01.000524
DO - 10.33552/APPR.2019.01.000524
M3 - Article
SN - 2641-2020
VL - 1
JO - Archives of Pharmacy and Pharmacological Research
JF - Archives of Pharmacy and Pharmacological Research
IS - 5
M1 - 000524
ER -