Abstract
In the burgeoning marketplaces of digital assets, non-fungible tokens (NFTs) revolutionize digital asset ownership and intellectual property (IP) protection, but high minting costs create barriers to marketplace entry and growth. This study examines the impact of “lazy minting”, a new NFT production method introduced by major NFT marketplaces to lower minting costs by deferring blockchain certification until the first sale. In response to the call for further
research on emerging technologies in operations management, we explore how this policy affects the net sales performance of existing sellers in the NFT marketplaces. Based on transaction cost economics (TCE) and the literature about different IP protection methods, we distinguish between lazy- and regular-minted NFTs by their differential transaction costs and utilize the staggered difference-in-differences (DID) method to conduct our analysis. We find
that lazy minting adoption significantly boosts the net sales performance of existing sellers. This is attributed to their cost-adaptive IP protection behavior. Specifically, they achieve this by minting more NFTs with a larger proportion of style-consistent NFTs through lazy minting, while strategically employing regular minting for style-breaking NFTs, which is contingent upon their reputation. Our study has important theoretical and practical implications for operations management under the emerging technological revolution.
research on emerging technologies in operations management, we explore how this policy affects the net sales performance of existing sellers in the NFT marketplaces. Based on transaction cost economics (TCE) and the literature about different IP protection methods, we distinguish between lazy- and regular-minted NFTs by their differential transaction costs and utilize the staggered difference-in-differences (DID) method to conduct our analysis. We find
that lazy minting adoption significantly boosts the net sales performance of existing sellers. This is attributed to their cost-adaptive IP protection behavior. Specifically, they achieve this by minting more NFTs with a larger proportion of style-consistent NFTs through lazy minting, while strategically employing regular minting for style-breaking NFTs, which is contingent upon their reputation. Our study has important theoretical and practical implications for operations management under the emerging technological revolution.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1017-1035 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Operations Management |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue number | 7 |
| Early online date | 20 Apr 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 30 Oct 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 Association for Supply Chain Management, Inc.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72121001), the Collaborative Research Fund provided by HKU Education Consulting (Shenzhen) Co. Ltd. (Grant Number SZRI2023-CRF-02), and the Key Research and Development Projects of Heilongjiang Province (JD22A003)
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| SZRI2023‐CRF‐02 | |
| National Natural Science Foundation of China | 72121001 |
| National Natural Science Foundation of China | |
| Key Research and Development Project of Hainan Province | JD22A003 |
| Key Research and Development Project of Hainan Province |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- NFT marketplaces
- Lazy minting
- IP protection strength
- Style signature
- Transaction cost economics
- seller performance
- transaction cost economics
- IP protection
- lazy minting
- style signature
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Impact of “Lazy Minting” on Seller Performance in NFT Marketplaces—A Transaction Cost Economics Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver