The impact of Digital Radiography on radiographic practice and technique.

Grainne Forsythe, Phil Doyle, Sonyia McFadden

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Digital Radiography has revolutionised radiography practice in modern imaging departments. It has enabled immediate image preview, use of a wider dynamic range and the ability to apply special image processing techniques that enhance overall display quality of the image. Whilst the improved changes to workflow are well documented, the impact of the technology on radiography practise has not.
Purpose: To analyse the reasons for rejected images in a busy imaging department and investigate any variations in technique.
Material and Methods: Reject analysis was undertaken on 8 digital rooms within one Healthcare Trust in the UK over a 3 month period. The equipment included 3 different manufacturers, one of which was a hybrid system (the manufacturer of the detector differed from the manufacturer of the DR console). Further analysis of the images investigated the use of anatomical markers and collimation at the time of exposure. Descriptive statistics were calculated with the aid of Microsoft Excel and the results illustrated in the form of pie charts.
Results: Reject rate was found to be higher than the WHO recommendations of 5%, for conventional radiography and ranged from 5.9% to 12.13% across the 3 different manufacturers. The most common reason for rejecting an image was due to positioning error. Most repeated views were lateral wrists, lateral ankles, lateral knees, Y view of shoulder plus antero-posterior view of chests. Further analysis demonstrated that radiographers tend to add the anatomical marker at the post-processing stage rather than at the time of exposure and the use of routine collimation was lacking.
Conclusions: Continuing professional development should be supplemented by refresher courses on basic radiographic techniques and education as radiographer practical skills remain paramount to good clinical practice.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1
Number of pages4
JournalImaging and Therapy Practice
Early online date18 Oct 2018
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Oct 2018

Fingerprint

Radiographic Image Enhancement
Radiography
Workflow
Wrist
Ankle
Knee
Thorax
Technology
Delivery of Health Care
Education
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • Digital Radiography, practice, technique

Cite this

@article{4526ee0fa0544a16a605d5525ea4ec3d,
title = "The impact of Digital Radiography on radiographic practice and technique.",
abstract = "Background: Digital Radiography has revolutionised radiography practice in modern imaging departments. It has enabled immediate image preview, use of a wider dynamic range and the ability to apply special image processing techniques that enhance overall display quality of the image. Whilst the improved changes to workflow are well documented, the impact of the technology on radiography practise has not. Purpose: To analyse the reasons for rejected images in a busy imaging department and investigate any variations in technique.Material and Methods: Reject analysis was undertaken on 8 digital rooms within one Healthcare Trust in the UK over a 3 month period. The equipment included 3 different manufacturers, one of which was a hybrid system (the manufacturer of the detector differed from the manufacturer of the DR console). Further analysis of the images investigated the use of anatomical markers and collimation at the time of exposure. Descriptive statistics were calculated with the aid of Microsoft Excel and the results illustrated in the form of pie charts.Results: Reject rate was found to be higher than the WHO recommendations of 5{\%}, for conventional radiography and ranged from 5.9{\%} to 12.13{\%} across the 3 different manufacturers. The most common reason for rejecting an image was due to positioning error. Most repeated views were lateral wrists, lateral ankles, lateral knees, Y view of shoulder plus antero-posterior view of chests. Further analysis demonstrated that radiographers tend to add the anatomical marker at the post-processing stage rather than at the time of exposure and the use of routine collimation was lacking.Conclusions: Continuing professional development should be supplemented by refresher courses on basic radiographic techniques and education as radiographer practical skills remain paramount to good clinical practice.",
keywords = "Digital Radiography, practice, technique",
author = "Grainne Forsythe and Phil Doyle and Sonyia McFadden",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "18",
language = "English",
pages = "1",

}

The impact of Digital Radiography on radiographic practice and technique. / Forsythe, Grainne; Doyle, Phil; McFadden, Sonyia.

18.10.2018, p. 1.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The impact of Digital Radiography on radiographic practice and technique.

AU - Forsythe, Grainne

AU - Doyle, Phil

AU - McFadden, Sonyia

PY - 2018/10/18

Y1 - 2018/10/18

N2 - Background: Digital Radiography has revolutionised radiography practice in modern imaging departments. It has enabled immediate image preview, use of a wider dynamic range and the ability to apply special image processing techniques that enhance overall display quality of the image. Whilst the improved changes to workflow are well documented, the impact of the technology on radiography practise has not. Purpose: To analyse the reasons for rejected images in a busy imaging department and investigate any variations in technique.Material and Methods: Reject analysis was undertaken on 8 digital rooms within one Healthcare Trust in the UK over a 3 month period. The equipment included 3 different manufacturers, one of which was a hybrid system (the manufacturer of the detector differed from the manufacturer of the DR console). Further analysis of the images investigated the use of anatomical markers and collimation at the time of exposure. Descriptive statistics were calculated with the aid of Microsoft Excel and the results illustrated in the form of pie charts.Results: Reject rate was found to be higher than the WHO recommendations of 5%, for conventional radiography and ranged from 5.9% to 12.13% across the 3 different manufacturers. The most common reason for rejecting an image was due to positioning error. Most repeated views were lateral wrists, lateral ankles, lateral knees, Y view of shoulder plus antero-posterior view of chests. Further analysis demonstrated that radiographers tend to add the anatomical marker at the post-processing stage rather than at the time of exposure and the use of routine collimation was lacking.Conclusions: Continuing professional development should be supplemented by refresher courses on basic radiographic techniques and education as radiographer practical skills remain paramount to good clinical practice.

AB - Background: Digital Radiography has revolutionised radiography practice in modern imaging departments. It has enabled immediate image preview, use of a wider dynamic range and the ability to apply special image processing techniques that enhance overall display quality of the image. Whilst the improved changes to workflow are well documented, the impact of the technology on radiography practise has not. Purpose: To analyse the reasons for rejected images in a busy imaging department and investigate any variations in technique.Material and Methods: Reject analysis was undertaken on 8 digital rooms within one Healthcare Trust in the UK over a 3 month period. The equipment included 3 different manufacturers, one of which was a hybrid system (the manufacturer of the detector differed from the manufacturer of the DR console). Further analysis of the images investigated the use of anatomical markers and collimation at the time of exposure. Descriptive statistics were calculated with the aid of Microsoft Excel and the results illustrated in the form of pie charts.Results: Reject rate was found to be higher than the WHO recommendations of 5%, for conventional radiography and ranged from 5.9% to 12.13% across the 3 different manufacturers. The most common reason for rejecting an image was due to positioning error. Most repeated views were lateral wrists, lateral ankles, lateral knees, Y view of shoulder plus antero-posterior view of chests. Further analysis demonstrated that radiographers tend to add the anatomical marker at the post-processing stage rather than at the time of exposure and the use of routine collimation was lacking.Conclusions: Continuing professional development should be supplemented by refresher courses on basic radiographic techniques and education as radiographer practical skills remain paramount to good clinical practice.

KW - Digital Radiography, practice, technique

M3 - Article

SP - 1

ER -