Abstract
Background
The public health guidance for physical activity (PA) levels in pregnancy recommends at least 150 minutes of moderate intensity PA weekly. The aim of this study was to understand how PA and sedentary behaviour levels of pregnant women with GDM in the UK have been affected by COVID-19.
Methods
An online survey exploring PA and sedentary behaviour levels of pregnant women with GDM during COVID-19 was carried out.
Sample
Women who had been pregnant with GDM during the COVID pandemic were recruited through various social media platforms.
Ethics
Ethical approval was granted by the Ulster University Nursing and Health Research Ethics Filter Committee.
Results
A total of 724 women accessed the survey, 553 of these met the eligibility criteria. Sedentary time increased for 79% of the women during the pandemic.
Almost half of the women (47%) were meeting the PA guidelines pre COVID during their pregnancy, dropping to 23% during the COVID pandemic. Fear of leaving the house due to COVID was the most commonly reported reason for the decline
Discussion
These results show the large impact of COVID-19 on PA and sedentary behaviour levels and highlights the need for targeted public health initiatives. Women with GDM need to know how it is safe and beneficial to them to engage in PA and ways to do this from their own homes if fear of leaving the house due to COVID is a barrier for them. Investment of targeted online PA classes provided by certified trainers in PA for pregnant women is a worthy investment. The challenge is how best to do this with reduced face to face appointments and extra pressure on resources.
The public health guidance for physical activity (PA) levels in pregnancy recommends at least 150 minutes of moderate intensity PA weekly. The aim of this study was to understand how PA and sedentary behaviour levels of pregnant women with GDM in the UK have been affected by COVID-19.
Methods
An online survey exploring PA and sedentary behaviour levels of pregnant women with GDM during COVID-19 was carried out.
Sample
Women who had been pregnant with GDM during the COVID pandemic were recruited through various social media platforms.
Ethics
Ethical approval was granted by the Ulster University Nursing and Health Research Ethics Filter Committee.
Results
A total of 724 women accessed the survey, 553 of these met the eligibility criteria. Sedentary time increased for 79% of the women during the pandemic.
Almost half of the women (47%) were meeting the PA guidelines pre COVID during their pregnancy, dropping to 23% during the COVID pandemic. Fear of leaving the house due to COVID was the most commonly reported reason for the decline
Discussion
These results show the large impact of COVID-19 on PA and sedentary behaviour levels and highlights the need for targeted public health initiatives. Women with GDM need to know how it is safe and beneficial to them to engage in PA and ways to do this from their own homes if fear of leaving the house due to COVID is a barrier for them. Investment of targeted online PA classes provided by certified trainers in PA for pregnant women is a worthy investment. The challenge is how best to do this with reduced face to face appointments and extra pressure on resources.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Coronavirus: the 2020 Director of Public Health report for Northern Ireland |
Pages | 172-177 |
Number of pages | 6 |
Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 31 Dec 2020 |
Keywords
- Gestational diabetes
- Covid-19
- physical activity
- sedentary behaviour
- pregnancy
- public health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of COVID-19 on the physical activity and sedentary behaviour levels of pregnant women with gestational diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Datasets
-
The impact of COVID-19 on the physical activity and sedentary behaviour levels of pregnant women with gestational diabetes
Hillyard, M. (Creator), Sinclair, M. (Creator), Murphy, M. (Creator) & Casson, K. (Creator), Ulster University, 12 May 2021
DOI: 10.21251/63d59840-e88b-43b8-a0da-74a152162f1f
Dataset
File