Abstract
Corporate label change (CLC) is a common way to establish a firm's new corporate identity to drive revenue nowadays, but its merits are controversial. We investigate the impacts of CLC, being a signal of corporate identity change, on firm's long-term labor productivity. We find that CLC negatively affects long-term labor productivity. We also find that reputable and labor-intensive firms suffer more from CLC. In the post-hoc analysis, we find that these firms may increase their research & development and capital intensity in their operations prior to pursuing CLC to mitigate CLC's negative impacts. An important managerial implication of this study is that senior management should not ignore employees as a major stakeholder in making CLC decision. Our findings also offer lessons to business executives on how to manage CLC to reduce its potential negative impacts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 96-108 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Business Research |
| Volume | 86 |
| Early online date | 6 Feb 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published (in print/issue) - 31 May 2018 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Corporate label change
- Firm performance
- Event study
- Institutional theory
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Impact of Corporate Label Change on Long-term Labor Productivity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver