The Glasgow Coma Scale and Evidence-Informed Practice: a critical review of where we are and where we need to be

Mary Braine, Neal F. Cook

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims and objectives. This paper aims to critically consider the evidence since theGlasgow Coma Scale was first launched, reflecting on how that evidence hasshaped practice. It illustrates the lack of clarity and consensus about the use ofthe tool in practice and draws upon existing evidence to determine the route toclarity for an evidence-informed approach to practice.Background. The Glasgow Coma Scale has permeated and influenced practice forover 40 years, being well-established worldwide as the key tool for assessing levelof consciousness. During this time, the tool has been scrutinised, evaluated, chal-lenged and re-launched in a plethora of publications. This has led to an insightinto the challenges, and to some extent the opportunities, in using the GlasgowComa Scale in practice but has also resulted in a lack of clarity.Design. This is a discursive paper that invites readers to explore and arrive at amore comprehensive understanding of the Glasgow Coma Scale in practice and isbased on searches of Scopus, Web of Knowledge, PubMed, Science Direct andCINAHL databases.Results. While the Glasgow Coma Scale has been rivalled by other tools in anattempt to improve upon it, a shift in practice to those tools has not occurred.The tool has withstood the test of time in this respect, indicating the need for fur-ther research into its use and a clear education strategy to standardise implemen-tation in practice.Conclusion. Further exploration is needed into the application of painful stimuliin using the Glasgow Coma Scale to assess level of consciousness. In addition, arobust educational strategy is necessary to maximise consistency in its use inpractice.Relevance to clinical practice. The evidence illustrates inconsistency and confu-sion in the use of the Glasgow Coma Scale in practice; this has the potential tocompromise care and clarity around the issues is therefore necessary.
LanguageEnglish
Pages280-293
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
Volume26
Issue number1-2
Early online date22 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2017

Fingerprint

Glasgow Coma Scale
Consciousness
Coma
PubMed
Publications
Consensus
Databases
Education
Research

Keywords

  • eye opening response
  • Glasgow Coma Scale
  • motor response
  • neurological assessment
  • painful stimuli

Cite this

@article{2027bde533a7481dbf7cf16f99cf23bb,
title = "The Glasgow Coma Scale and Evidence-Informed Practice: a critical review of where we are and where we need to be",
abstract = "Aims and objectives. This paper aims to critically consider the evidence since theGlasgow Coma Scale was first launched, reflecting on how that evidence hasshaped practice. It illustrates the lack of clarity and consensus about the use ofthe tool in practice and draws upon existing evidence to determine the route toclarity for an evidence-informed approach to practice.Background. The Glasgow Coma Scale has permeated and influenced practice forover 40 years, being well-established worldwide as the key tool for assessing levelof consciousness. During this time, the tool has been scrutinised, evaluated, chal-lenged and re-launched in a plethora of publications. This has led to an insightinto the challenges, and to some extent the opportunities, in using the GlasgowComa Scale in practice but has also resulted in a lack of clarity.Design. This is a discursive paper that invites readers to explore and arrive at amore comprehensive understanding of the Glasgow Coma Scale in practice and isbased on searches of Scopus, Web of Knowledge, PubMed, Science Direct andCINAHL databases.Results. While the Glasgow Coma Scale has been rivalled by other tools in anattempt to improve upon it, a shift in practice to those tools has not occurred.The tool has withstood the test of time in this respect, indicating the need for fur-ther research into its use and a clear education strategy to standardise implemen-tation in practice.Conclusion. Further exploration is needed into the application of painful stimuliin using the Glasgow Coma Scale to assess level of consciousness. In addition, arobust educational strategy is necessary to maximise consistency in its use inpractice.Relevance to clinical practice. The evidence illustrates inconsistency and confu-sion in the use of the Glasgow Coma Scale in practice; this has the potential tocompromise care and clarity around the issues is therefore necessary.",
keywords = "eye opening response, Glasgow Coma Scale, motor response, neurological assessment, painful stimuli",
author = "Mary Braine and Cook, {Neal F.}",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jocn.13390",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "280--293",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Nursing",
issn = "0962-1067",
number = "1-2",

}

The Glasgow Coma Scale and Evidence-Informed Practice: a critical review of where we are and where we need to be. / Braine, Mary; Cook, Neal F.

In: Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 26, No. 1-2, 01.2017, p. 280-293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Glasgow Coma Scale and Evidence-Informed Practice: a critical review of where we are and where we need to be

AU - Braine, Mary

AU - Cook, Neal F.

PY - 2017/1

Y1 - 2017/1

N2 - Aims and objectives. This paper aims to critically consider the evidence since theGlasgow Coma Scale was first launched, reflecting on how that evidence hasshaped practice. It illustrates the lack of clarity and consensus about the use ofthe tool in practice and draws upon existing evidence to determine the route toclarity for an evidence-informed approach to practice.Background. The Glasgow Coma Scale has permeated and influenced practice forover 40 years, being well-established worldwide as the key tool for assessing levelof consciousness. During this time, the tool has been scrutinised, evaluated, chal-lenged and re-launched in a plethora of publications. This has led to an insightinto the challenges, and to some extent the opportunities, in using the GlasgowComa Scale in practice but has also resulted in a lack of clarity.Design. This is a discursive paper that invites readers to explore and arrive at amore comprehensive understanding of the Glasgow Coma Scale in practice and isbased on searches of Scopus, Web of Knowledge, PubMed, Science Direct andCINAHL databases.Results. While the Glasgow Coma Scale has been rivalled by other tools in anattempt to improve upon it, a shift in practice to those tools has not occurred.The tool has withstood the test of time in this respect, indicating the need for fur-ther research into its use and a clear education strategy to standardise implemen-tation in practice.Conclusion. Further exploration is needed into the application of painful stimuliin using the Glasgow Coma Scale to assess level of consciousness. In addition, arobust educational strategy is necessary to maximise consistency in its use inpractice.Relevance to clinical practice. The evidence illustrates inconsistency and confu-sion in the use of the Glasgow Coma Scale in practice; this has the potential tocompromise care and clarity around the issues is therefore necessary.

AB - Aims and objectives. This paper aims to critically consider the evidence since theGlasgow Coma Scale was first launched, reflecting on how that evidence hasshaped practice. It illustrates the lack of clarity and consensus about the use ofthe tool in practice and draws upon existing evidence to determine the route toclarity for an evidence-informed approach to practice.Background. The Glasgow Coma Scale has permeated and influenced practice forover 40 years, being well-established worldwide as the key tool for assessing levelof consciousness. During this time, the tool has been scrutinised, evaluated, chal-lenged and re-launched in a plethora of publications. This has led to an insightinto the challenges, and to some extent the opportunities, in using the GlasgowComa Scale in practice but has also resulted in a lack of clarity.Design. This is a discursive paper that invites readers to explore and arrive at amore comprehensive understanding of the Glasgow Coma Scale in practice and isbased on searches of Scopus, Web of Knowledge, PubMed, Science Direct andCINAHL databases.Results. While the Glasgow Coma Scale has been rivalled by other tools in anattempt to improve upon it, a shift in practice to those tools has not occurred.The tool has withstood the test of time in this respect, indicating the need for fur-ther research into its use and a clear education strategy to standardise implemen-tation in practice.Conclusion. Further exploration is needed into the application of painful stimuliin using the Glasgow Coma Scale to assess level of consciousness. In addition, arobust educational strategy is necessary to maximise consistency in its use inpractice.Relevance to clinical practice. The evidence illustrates inconsistency and confu-sion in the use of the Glasgow Coma Scale in practice; this has the potential tocompromise care and clarity around the issues is therefore necessary.

KW - eye opening response

KW - Glasgow Coma Scale

KW - motor response

KW - neurological assessment

KW - painful stimuli

U2 - 10.1111/jocn.13390

DO - 10.1111/jocn.13390

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 280

EP - 293

JO - Journal of Clinical Nursing

T2 - Journal of Clinical Nursing

JF - Journal of Clinical Nursing

SN - 0962-1067

IS - 1-2

ER -